Template talk:Parliament.ch

Brokeback Template?
As you may note, there are several people articles that link to this template. And apparently, they all have a redlink (well, actually more of a brownlink in ?useskin=monobook) such as the one shone at the bottom of this template page. Was this done intentionally? or is this template broken? &mdash;  .`^) Paine Ellsworthdiss`cuss (^`.   06:44, 14 September 2009 (UTC) PS. ("Inquiring minds . . ." and all that )
 * The issue is compatibility with languageicon. That template was recently "simplified", which may have caused this problem. For now, I think disabling the language component of this template should remove the faulty functionality. Skomorokh  07:00, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Excellent. Thank you very much, Skomorokh!
 * &mdash;  .`^) Paine Ellsworthdiss`cuss (^`.   09:00, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem, Paine. Skomorokh  09:01, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Could you fix it and re-add it? -- 签名 sig  at  06:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)