Template talk:Pd-us

Protected edit request on 21 February 2014
Please remove   to remove this page from Category:Pages with templates in the wrong namespace. Thanks,

Wbm1058 (talk) 22:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done for now: Per the ongoing discussion on Template talk:Isp. — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 22:36, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Reopening my request. Wbm1058 (talk) 14:48, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: The consensus building on that RfC was that this template should be allowed to be used in any namespace and should be modified to only show the text portion outside of mainspace. — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 15:00, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Nonsense. You were the only editor commenting in that RfC in support of your position. Isn't it a little presumptuous of you to be using "not done" tags, when you don't have the authority to use done for this request. Why can't you save this request for an administrator to process? Wbm1058 (talk) 15:10, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * This page just needs a null edit or to wait for the job queue to process it. It is no longer in Category:Pages with templates in the wrong namespace once that happens.  no need to remove the template. — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 22:06, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done. Technical 13, I don't see a consensus just now to change the way these template categories work. Until such a consensus is found, we should continue to do things the old way, i.e. use R from alternative capitalisation only in the main namespace. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 02:46, 9 March 2014 (UTC)