Template talk:Possilikely

Let's use English on English Wikipedia
English is a rich and varied language. Let's use existing words (e.g. "credible") so we look more like masters of language than a bunch of Nerds. NE Ent 02:24, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Debating what those maintaining SPI should do is not helpful, especially when it concerns trivia. Johnuniq (talk) 03:35, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I still think a "Possible leaning on Likely" is better. "Credible" may confuse people. --TL22 (talk) 03:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't see how it "confuses people" when it is explained in the parenthesis. The admins and clerks working in the WP:SPI understand this word very well. Please, do not try to help us this way. If you want to help, apply for the SPI Clerkship, as the process is heavily backlogged. For those who say that this word does not exist, I have to say that the word "Wikipedia" also does not exist.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:24, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 17 March 2021
Change undefined to undefined which allows arbitrary modification of the template text, hence bringing this in line with bnt, confirmed and other SPI templates that already function this way. While this isn't a crucial or urgent change by any means, it provides some added flexibility to use the template in other contexts. Blablubbs | talk 19:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅, sure, why not? and thank you very much!  P.I. Ellsworth   ed.  put'r there 22:20, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! :) Blablubbs | talk 22:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)