Template talk:Prem Rawat/Archive 1

Minor additions

 * Minor additions to template, standard "Tnavbar" and added categories, template was previously not in any category. Probably a good idea to tighten the category inclusion though.  Smee 12:15, 17 January 2007 (UTC).

Change
I have switched the format for Template:Prem Rawat to Template:Navbox generic. I used Template:Gandhi as a model for this. Smee 08:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC).
 * Entries are organized alphabetically within the template, from left to right. Smee 09:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC).

Thanks. I have removed Rennie Davies. He was a spokesperson for a while but do not thing that that warrants its inclusion. His name is already wikilinked from some of the articles. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 12:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * As you wish. Smee 13:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC).
 * Looks good, though... Is this a new template that is widely used in Biographies? ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 13:01, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, it is a relatively not so new template anymore, that is widely used in pretty much everything and anything. See Template:Navbox generic for more info, it's pretty cool.  Smee 13:02, 16 May 2007 (UTC).

Fixed links to Wikimedia sister projects with appropriate interwiki links, and removed a link to a Wikipedia mirrored article at Citizendium. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 15:29, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Citizendium is not pertinent as a related project? It's not really a "mirror"...  Smee 22:09, 16 May 2007 (UTC).
 * It is an external link, Smee, not a Wikimedia sister project. It could be added to the EL section, with the provisos stated at WP:EL. I have not seen ELs placed on templates, as these are designed to serve as navigational aid in WP and sister projects. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 22:13, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh. Thanks for the polite clarification, Jossi.  Are there any other pertinent Wikimedia sister projects?  Smee 22:13, 16 May 2007 (UTC).
 * See WP:SISTER :) ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 23:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, yes. Thanks for the wikilink.  I mean, do you know of any other Sister Projects that are pertinent to this particular topic?  Smee 23:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC).
 * No, I don't. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 23:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Alright then. Thanks for the info.  Smee 00:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC).

Added authorized biography...
... to the template, Who Is Guru Maharaj Ji?, article sourced to (16) reputable citations. Smee 10:55, 17 May 2007 (UTC).

Other books
There are literally hundreds of books in which Prem Rawat is mentioned. We need to apply good editorial judgment on which books to add to this template. I have removed "Soul Rush". It is already wikilinked from the main article, alongside a score of others, and it is also listed on the list of related topics. That should suffice. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 15:40, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The book is 17 chapters long, and over half the book, a full nine chapters, directly deals only with Guru Maharaj Ji and Divine Light Mission. That is a good amount of emphasis, and the book should remain wikilinked in the template.  Smee 15:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC).
 * I have the book and I have read it. It is not a scholarly book, but a personal biography. The book is fun reading, but do not think it merits its inclusion in that template. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 16:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Personal biographies where over half of the biography directly discusses life with Guru Maharaj Ji and the Divine Light Mission is not directly relevant in a template about the topic? That seems highly odd.  Smee 16:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC).


 * Regardless of whether or not the article should be included in the template itself, the template is a useful navigational tool, and should remain on the article's page, as a footer at the bottom of the article. Smee 08:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC).

Old probation notice

 * This period ended June 4, 2008. Cirt (talk) 23:44, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Sister links
Not sure why the links to sister projects were removed. I think they are highly relevant, useful, and informative, so I have restored them. Cirt (talk) 06:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I removed them at the behest of someone commenting at the FAC. I do notice that the links are already in the Prem Rawat article. But it doesn't matter to me either way.   Will Beback    talk    01:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks, I think the template's better with them included. Cirt (talk) 05:01, 28 May 2009 (UTC)