Template talk:Psilocybin mushroomsx

Why is this here?
Is this template really necessary? Is it helpful? It is growing quite large.

And it has the unintended effect of when you google search for any psychoactive mushroom, all the other ones come up. That is quite annoying.

Should we get rid of it?

Alan Rockefeller (Talk - contribs) 07:40, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Sounds good to me.. What do you think of creating section pages (i.e section aztecorum) to link the bluing psilocybes to?

Or perhaps we could include the section info on the main psilocybe page and link back to that.? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Warriorsoul (talk • contribs) 15:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Grouping
Created subgroups for the various genera, should abbreviate the entries with just the species (or genus abrev. species). Would shorten this a lot and make it less overwhelming. Zodon (talk) 08:49, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Named incorrectly
This template should be called Psilocybin mushrooms instead of Psilocybe mushrooms. There are many psilocybin mushrooms listed that are not in the genus Psilocybe. Alan Rockefeller (Talk - contribs) 16:31, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree, and have boldy performed the move. Sasata (talk) 06:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)