Template talk:R from ATC code

Cat parameter
It should be noted that this Rcat uses the Redirect template template, which seems to have some restrictions to its usage that may impact this template. For example, I tried to use that template's "printworthy=no" parameter to automatically add the Rcat to the Templates for unprintworthy redirects category. That didn't work, so I reverted my edits and made an adjustment to the Redirect template/doc page. The bottom line is that I cannot tell if the unnamed parameter is actually working properly to sort these redirects correctly in Category:Redirects from ATC codes, since the redirects are actually titled with the same code as in the unnamed parameter. This leads to the question as to why the unnamed parameter is even required, but I will leave that to another day. If another editor finds that inclusion of the unnamed parameter inside the Redirect template templates breaks something, then feel free to eliminate it, as it doesn't seem to actually do anything important. I could be wrong about that, though. – PIE  (  C LIMAX   )  06:57, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Just to note it, the unnamed sort parameter is necessary in order to be able to use the category TOC on these alpha-numeric codes; otherwise these redirects would all be listed under letter "A" (for "ATC code Xnnn") and not under their actual, sorted codes. Same goes for R from ATCvet code.  So far, there does not appear to be any problem with the #if: parser within template Redirect template. –   Paine    11:12, 28 November 2014 (UTC)