Template talk:R from incorrect punctuation

Edit summary January 3
I meant: Nothing should link to redirects which are "incorrect punctuation". Christian75 (talk) 23:25, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Should not redirect to R from modification
This template should redirect to Template:R from misspelling (incorrect spelling). So the established pattern is to differentiate between alternative and incorrect, with the "unprintworthy-ness" of the incorrect redirect being an important distinction.

Senator2029 “Talk” 23:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC) So let's come to a conclusion here. It's okay to have this template point to instead of ? Senator2029 “Talk”   07:52, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree that template:R from incorrect punctuation should redirect to a "R from incorrect" ... I was reverted by Paine Ellsworth with the argument that it "broke a lot of redirects" when I tried to retarget the redirect - but I do not know what it broke (it wasn't a double redirect). Christian75 (talk) 12:04, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I suppose I've been going with the editors who created some of these and what they originally intended. They seem to have promoted a distinction between "spelling" and "punctuation/hyphenation". A redirect like is a misspelling; however, a redirect that is a modification of punctuation/hyphenation, such as  is more generally a "modification", definitely not a misspelling. So that's why I revert these by saying that all those many redirects have been "broken". I don't see them as "misspellings", I see them as "modifications", just as the originators intended. So if the equating of "misspellings" and "mis-punctuations" can be justified, then the originators and I could be wrong.  P. I. Ellsworth ,  ed.  put'r there 13:01, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I !vote for the distinction between alternative/option and incorrect/mistake. That's more important than a distinction between whether the change is alphabetic or non-alphabetic.  Most of our punctuation-related rcats redirect to "modification" anyway, so there's no alpha/non-alpha distinction being consistently made anyway. I created some of the incorrect-labeled ones, specifically to distinguish between printworthy and leave alone versus unprintworthy and categorize for cleanup.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  21:04, 30 November 2019 (UTC) PS: I would propose a maint. category structure of incorrect spelling/misspelling at the top, with subcats incorrect capitalization/miscapitalization and incorrect punctuation, the latter with a subcat of incorrect hyphenation. Or that last could upmerge to incorrect punctuation if we don't care to be so specific. I'm in favor of more specificity because these templates and internal cats. are "cheap". (Unlike this cat, which is very, very expensive.)  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  21:21, 30 November 2019 (UTC)