Template talk:Ratchet & Clank series

Progress
Added the upcoming PS3 game to the box.--70.158.160.6 14:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Made everything on two lines. Machine758 09:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Canon Confusion
Would Ratchet & Clank: Size Matters count as being a part of the main R&C canon? The article says it is, but on the Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction it says it isn't. I saw the Tools of Destruction article first, so I changed the template accordingly, but then I saw the Size Matters page that says it is. They have contradictory statements and on neither page are these statements sourced. If someone could find a source then maybe we can settle this, otherwise we have two pages saying two different things, and possibly a wrong template.
 * Tools of Destruction page:
 * "It is the fifth installment in the official Ratchet & Clank canon..."
 * Size Matters page:
 * "...the 5th in the series..."

Fantasy Dragon (talk) 19:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Listing games by console or series
To avoid an edit war, let's discuss it here. I believe the template should be kept as it is. I don't see the point of listing them by console. 1. I've never seen it done like that anwywhere else. 2. It just doesn't seem right. Listing them by the separate series seems like the best way to me. Every other template I've seen lists the games like this. 3. With this way, it's linking the same article twice. There is no need to list a game/article twice; it's just redundant. 4. The Future is in italics, showing formatting. As in the series with Future in its title. No one can be held accountable for if you read the formatting wrong; that's why we have it. The heading "Future series" does not indicate the titles that will be coming out in the future. It's referring to the series of R&C Future. It takes three seconds to go to an article and look at the infobox to see if it has been released yet. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 20:47, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Size Matters
Size Matters is not part of the original series. It's a spin-off. Only the games made by Insomniac Games are canon; High Impact Games made the spin-offs. Should we fix it? If no one says against it in a week I will change it. 87.101.241.38 (talk) 19:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I made this point a couple of discussions above this, but nobody responded. I think we should find a source. Fantasy Dragon (talk) 19:21, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well since none of the games really do coincide with each other it doesn't matter entirely. But I do believe that games made by other developers are spin-off games. Or if they are considered canon, all games made by that company are canon. We could list Size Matters and Secret Agent Clank under "Games developed by High Impact Games" or something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.101.241.38 (talk) 18:18, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

On the offical Ratchet and Clank Series Website Size Matters is under the original series article so yes Size Matters is a part of the original series GuineaPigWarrior (talk) 20:03, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree with guinea pig warrior. Spongefrog,   (talk to me, or else)  21:40, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Dispute
So what is the dispute here all about, anyway? It looks to me like its just two different ways to display the same information. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 21:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Change
}}

should be

}} .174.3.111.148 (talk) 21:00, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Skomorokh,  barbarian  00:26, 8 November 2009 (UTC)