Template talk:RationalSkepticismTasks

So how is this list maintained? I scanned the history, and see that people just add and remove items. So, I visited an article that was listed for "peer review or POV check", found it OK, and removed it from the list. If this list needs more instruction than that, I guess it should go here. Długosz (talk)

Is there progress on Immanuel Velikovksy? Calling him plain pseudohistorian I find quite misleading as he always called for testing his hypothesis with the then-young C14 method for age determination. Is everyone to be called a pseudoscientist when opposing accepted science doctrine? I don't see irrationality in the writings of Velikovsky, although challenging to scientific dogma. How much room for controversy are you allowing? (Barnabas) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.119.31.252 (talk) 22:48, 3 March 2012 (UTC)