Template talk:Relief Line (Toronto)

Line names versus route names
In regards to your edit, User:Useddenim, showing the name of the subdivision, rather than the more commonly understood route name, might be technically more correct, but isn't consistent with Template:Line 2 Bloor–Danforth which shows route names. I also think that it makes the article more inaccessible, as most people are familiar with the routes that use the track, rather than a particular subdivision. While in a very complex network, where routes can vary frequently, this might not work, this isn't the case for a simple network like Toronto. Are you opposed to making it consistent with the Line 2 template? Or even the Line 1 template now that the Barrie line crosses it. Nfitz (talk) 20:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)