Template talk:Religion in South Africa

Colours
Hi, sorry I do find the flag colours a bit overwhelming for this template. HelenOnline (talk) 09:21, 4 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I agree, and I also suspect that they might affect accessibility for colorblind users (see WP:COLOUR). My opinion is that, barring some very good reason, navbox templates should use the default colours. - htonl (talk) 15:18, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
I reverted a bold edit by Cryx88 ("mormons are not christians at all"). Cryx88 has repeated the edit ("Mormons are not Christians") without discussion. According to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Mormons are Christians and contradictory templates amounts to a POV fork. Helen Online  12:12, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Mormons are not Christians at all because Christians believe in the Bible not the Book of Mormon, so Mormons are NOT Christians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cryx88 (talk • contribs) 12:14, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Have you taken it up at The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Templates are not the place to challenge the content of Wikipedia articles. Helen  Online  12:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I see you have continued edit warring despite being warned against it. It will not help you in the long run and you could end up with a block on your record. Is that what you want? Helen  Online  12:23, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Mormons believe in the Bible. Our article says they are Christians. Our NPOV policy means we call them Christians no matter what you think. Dougweller (talk) 15:44, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * 72 hour block given at AN3. Dougweller (talk) 16:01, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Reminds me of the similar discussion I had, here at Talk:Growth of religion. Bladesmulti (talk) 16:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I have reverted an anonymous identical edit after the expiry of the block and will open a sockpuppet investigation if the disruptive editing continues. Helen  Online  11:05, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I really wonder, because this editor(crx88) is already unbanned, he can edit the page himself, why he would need sock puppets? Bladesmulti (talk) 13:05, 26 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Cryx88 would be liable for further sanctions if they persisted with their disruptive editing. They have been warned explicitly by an administrator that "if you return after expiration of this block and repeat the same misconduct, you are likely to be blocked for much longer, potentially indefinitely". Helen  Online  13:16, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Fine, if saw one more vandalism. Page lock should be requested too. Bladesmulti (talk) 13:20, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, I've protected the page for one month. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:04, 26 December 2013 (UTC)