Template talk:Samsung phones

untitled
It'd be cool if there was a page for the Samsung T409, one of the few phones to work with the T-Mobile hot spot at home. Mathiastck 20:33, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

New Categories
The cellphones are organized by their model numbers. However, model numbers of Samsung cellphones barely reflect their line of models. I think it might be useful to organize them by release date or form factor. I added Ultra Edition categories as they are strongly tied together. I'm also thinking about adding one for Blackjack if no one minds. 74.15.52.79 (talk) 18:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The website is organized by carrier. I'm not sure that logically groups the phones into meaningful categories.  If we do it by release date, should we do it by year?  form factor might not provide enough meaningful categories, either.  --Zr2d2 (talk) 03:37, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

To Do
Create pages for: --Zr2d2 (talk) 20:41, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * A717
 * A727
 * A737
 * A930
 * B2700 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.13.186.1 (talk) 00:40, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * D830 (9.9)
 * E590
 * E710
 * F300 (Ultra Music)
 * F500 (Ultra Video)
 * T309
 * T409
 * T729 (Blast)
 * u300 (9.6)
 * u300
 * u900 (Soul)

yo!
where be the Anycall Haptic?

http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/haptic-technology.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.87.188.58 (talk) 11:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

why is the s and z series mising?
s400 s500 and z320 are ony some devices i know (see i-mode)  mabdul 0=* 02:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

H series?
why is there an H entry "H1" containing incorrectly-punctuated encyclopaedic information in the G column? can someone confirm the existence/nonexistence of this model? i'm commenting the encylopaedic information for now. — Owl order (talk) 22:31, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

i just noticed another one -- M1. commenting encylopaedic information and relocating it from the left to the right column. — Owl order (talk) 22:35, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Group List
The Navbox template can only go up to 20 List of Group, so it makes some group invisible, any idea to fix it? A tumiwa (talk) 04:29, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Is this really required?
This kind of thing really strains my inclusionism. Really? We need a page for every phone Samsung have ever made? This is like Pokemon all over again. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:12, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree with you here, I think per WP:NOTADIRECTORY we should just include the notable phones here. All of the models that dont have an article can be redirected to Samsung Electronics. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 05:17, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Samsug Mobile List
I would like to see the list of mobiles presented in the same fashion as done for nokia - example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nokia_products

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.27.5.42 (talk) 11:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

it`s hard, because Samsung has more than 1500 models. --A tumiwa (talk) 04:22, 23 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Is that the reason why some models are commented out and only those with actual articles about them have been left in? -Mardus (talk) 20:53, 23 May 2012 (UTC)