Template talk:Series overview/Archive 2

TBA consistency
So, since shaded cells are the usual here, could we change all of them to use instead? It looks pretty strange to me to use two different styles in the same table, like at List of American Horror Story episodes. – nyuszika7h (talk) 10:20, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Actually there it's manually specified and won't work there (I thought the module had code to auto-detect that, but apparently it doesn't work), but I think I saw some hardcoded TableTBAs in the module code too. Maybe we could make it convert a "TBA" value to. – nyuszika7h (talk) 10:21, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * used to work, not sure why it's not now. Unless it only works when is used inside the module itself, rather than from the template. I'll look into it.  Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 10:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 08:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Missing padding for multi-part season
At List of Soy Luna episodes, there's a problem with the second part of the second season. There is no padding so the height is too low compared to other rows. nyuszika7h (talk) 16:08, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * It appears it will be "solved" once an episode count is added, but might not be a bad thing to include code that adds the padding while the ep count is TBD. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:34, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I have noticed that before, just never got around to it. I'll fix it later today. --  Alex TW 23:29, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ --  Alex TW 23:58, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

"No color" parameter option?...
Is there a way to get this template to default to the same color as the Episode table template does, when no color value is placed in a "colorn" parameter (i.e. when it is left blank)? That would be a very useful option... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:53, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * It's certainly possible, but I'm curious as to how it would be useful? --  Alex TW 13:01, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Look at the current version of List of Miles from Tomorrowland episodes – the "default color" is shown in the season 3 table, but not in the series overview table. This won't come up often, but especially at older TV series articles, "no color" is quite often chosen in the season episode tables – it would be nice if there was an "easy" way to "match" the series overview table to that... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:04, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * One other point on this: it doesn't make sense to have Episode table "auto"-fill in a color for you, but have Series overview not "auto"-fill in a color for you – either both templates should, or neither should... There are probably several options for handling this. One is simply to have them both "auto"-fill in that lavender/orchid(?) color for you if you leave the "background/color" parameter blank. Another option is to have no color filled in by both templates if you leave the "background/color" parameter blank, but have it "auto"-fill in the lavender/orchid(?) color if you type "auto" (or something like that) into the color parameter... But, bottom line IMO: both of these parameters should handle this issue the same way. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:46, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Gotcha. Makes sense.
 * However, those cells had their colours removed by you before you linked the current version of that article, as they violated WP:COLOR, meaning that originally they weren't setting to a default colour. There's always a colour allowable - per MOS:TV, if there's no DVD artwork, then the series logo can be used as a basis. --  Alex TW 05:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * At that particular article, I am sure someone will be along to add a color for season 3. That's not really the point though. Lots of articles at some point or other, either temporarily, or because they're old articles, will need this "autofill color" option. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

"Broadcast" as an alternative to "aired"
In the UK, the word "broadcast" is usually used instead of "aired". I propose there should be some option to replace "broadcast" by "aired" in this template (for British English articles). I don't know if other English-speaking countries follow UK practice, so I don't know if it would be appropriate to make the above switch automatically whenever "season" is automatically changed to "series". --  Dr Greg   talk  20:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * This sounds reasonable given WP:ENGVAR and the fact we do this for series/season already.


 * Overall, I would love to switch to just "released" for everything because there's been some debate about whether "aired" is narrowly defined as "traditionally broadcast over the airwaves" or more flexibly whenever it is made available publicly, no matter what the medium. That is, sometimes something is made available online in advance of its traditional "airing"/broadcast and you'll list that date in the "aired" field and then you may get reverted by people who claim that this isn't the "real" air date because it didn't actually "air" (as in it wasn't traditionally broadcast on a television channel). So then you might get a situation where you have people writing plot summaries for episodes because those episodes have been available publicly for days or weeks and others who will revert you on the basis of the episode not having "aired". I find it pretty ridiculous—we don't need to use "released" even (as I realize that is currently meant to cover web series/non-traditional availability) but I think we should adopt a generic term that covers a date where an episode was made "widely or publicly available irrespective of medium". Because convergence on that front is not going to decrease: the distinction between a traditional "airing" and an online release is pretty clearly going to continue to blur. So maybe something like "date available" or "available date". Okay, I take it back: we should just use "Release date" for everything, irrespective of medium. Or just clearly specify that "aired" (and "broadcast" if we go with that) are not limited to traditional usage. —Joeyconnick (talk) 22:05, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll support "release date". The current "Originally aired" with subheadings "First aired" and "Last aired" carries some redundancy and I found "Last aired" to be a bit ambiguous. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:23, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * "Release date" brings with it another set of problems. We need to make it clear that the "release date" is the date on which the episode was originally released, and not any subsequent release dates of the same episode. We already have the problem with many new editors who do not seem to understand this requirement. For example, the  and   fields in Infobox television are often changed to include networks or channels that first started airing a program many years after its original broadcast. I don't really see the redundancy or ambiguity mentioned by . "First aired" is the date the first episode of the season was originally aired while "Last aired" is the date that the last episode of the season was originally aired. There are no other fields that convey this information so they aren't redundant. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 00:13, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

bug?
I think there might be a bug in the code that deals with the "info" params.

At Once (TV series), I had to explicitly add the infoB2A in the following to get the table to render properly:

But from reading the documentation and checking the examples, my understanding is that if infoB is defined for previous seasons (which it is, for 1A and 1B), then infoB2A should have been able to be skipped/omitted and the template should have automatically put in the. Which it doesn't... instead you get what's showing at this example. So... legit bug? —Joeyconnick (talk) 03:32, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * , it does seem to be a bug. You're right, it should be able to be omitted and added automatically. I'll take a look at it tonight for you. Thanks for reporting this! --  Alex TW 04:06, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * , I believe it to be fixed now. Cheers. --  Alex TW 12:44, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Hey ... yes, it is working as intended now, from what I can tell. Thanks for the speedy fix! —Joeyconnick (talk) 16:41, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

"Series" vs "Season" based on first date's format?
Stumbled over this while editing Money Heist. In this code excerpt  -- Base series/season content on the format of the first date; Series = D M Y, Season = M D, Y local matchDMY = false local thisStart = firstRow.start or firstRow.startA if thisStart then if string.match(thisStart:gsub(" "," "), '(%d+)%s(%a+)%s(%d+)') then matchDMY = true end end

-- Season header headerRow:tag('th') :attr('scope', 'col') :attr('rowspan', allReleased and numInfoCells == 0 and 1 or 2) :attr('colspan', 2) :css('padding', cellPadding) :wikitext(args.seriesT or args.seasonT or (matchDMY and 'Series') or 'Season') it is looked up which format is used for the first date in the template, based on which the title is set to "Series" instead of "Season". Why is that? Why should a table's date format dictate the terminlogy used in that table?

I propose that a simple parameter  should be used to clarify which terminlogy should be used when not identifiable through other paremters. I arranged a simple sandboxed version and prepared two testcases. If you think that this is a good idea, I can make the changes go live. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 20:18, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I also noticed this issue at Money Heist. The code here is beyond me, but I'm for whatever solution can fix the date format not changing the terminology from season to series, as that is inaccurate. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 20:38, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Already exists. Use series or season. Thanks for your work anyways, no need for any changes. --  Alex TW 01:47, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I see, but is therr any reason there is two of them? We could just as well use Series or something in that direction. Furthermore, would you agree that the format=terminology logic is useless? Case example: Doctor Who formerly used Seasons (pre-2005) but also dmy formats. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 10:28, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Backup parameter. More articles exist where its DMY format and "Series" (i.e. UK series) than DMY format and season. See List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present): It uses "Season / Series". --  Alex TW 16:45, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Related, Australia uses dmy format but we use both "series" and "season". -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:56, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * We do indeed, hence the two parameters, for those who want to use either, and the ability to change it. --  Alex TW 01:57, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * , I see what you mean, and yes we don't need a new parameter indeed (which I didn't realize before). But do you think it'd still make sense to remove the altering of the term based on the date format one single cell in the entire has? This way people using dmy formatting don't have to use seasonT just to get the standard output. The module sandbox is up-to-date with said "feature" removed if you just want to copy-paste. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 17:46, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * , yes, I do. Put simply, there are more articles that use DMY/Series (as this is typically the default for the UK and its series) than those that use the alternative DMY/Season or MDY/Series. So it makes sense to accommodate for this situation first, as it applies to more articles, and then provide an alternative for the alternative case. --  Alex TW 01:53, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 18 December 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the template at this time. As far as canvassing is concerned, it does not appear that the discussion would have resulted in a consensus to move the page were the message in question not posted. However, please remember that notifications must be framed in neutral terms in order to be appropriate. Conversely, please do not file technical requests for moves when there have been previous discussions of the same issue resulting in a lack of consensus. Dekimasu よ! 19:31, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Template:Series overview → Template:Television series overview – For clarity Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:31, 18 December 2018 (UTC) --Relisted. –Ammarpad (talk) 04:44, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). --  Alex TW 11:29, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * This discussion is the subject of, contrary to WP:CANVASS. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:54, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Informing a WikiProject of a discussion that relates to said Project is not canvassing. I recommend you learn about informing Projects about discussions that relate to them - you've already been requested by other editors to do so. --  Alex TW 13:17, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Had I said that "informing a WikiProject of a discussion that relates to said Project is canvassing" you may have had a point. You are aware of WP:CANVASS from previous discussions. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:20, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I have not canvassed on or for this discussion. The diff that you linked is my informing the WikiProject, as you should have done for this template and the infoboxes. --  Alex TW 13:22, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Your post is clearly in breach of WP:CANVAS. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:28, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * State the part that it is in violation of. Per WP:APPNOTE: An editor who may wish to draw a wider range of informed, but uninvolved, editors to a discussion can place a message at any of the following: The talk page or noticeboard of one or more WikiProjects or other Wikipedia collaborations which may have interest in the topic under discussion. --  Alex TW 13:30, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The part that prohibits partisan canvassing. HTH. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:33, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * You cannot directly quote any part that prohibits informing a Project. Your accusation is mute. --  Alex TW 13:36, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Straw man; for the reason I have already indicated. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:38, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I recommend you strike your statement; you have already been reported for edit-warring over this issue. No canvassing has occurred. --  Alex TW 13:40, 18 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Oppose: it's not clear why this would be an improvement. Based on its documentation and parameters, I doubt anyone would try to use this on Grandi's series, Quercus ser. Virentes or any other non-television types of series. — Bilorv(c)(talk) 13:05, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * "it's not clear why this would be an improvement" Because there are other types of series: book series, sports series, etc. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:12, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose: this would be unnecessary disambiguation which would potentially confuse editors with no benefit. What has changed since the last time the nominator made exactly the same nomination? Why did he think it would be uncontroversial after the reaction to his merge proposal? Matt14451 (talk) 13:18, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose Per above and Template talk:Series overview/Archive 1. --  Alex TW 13:22, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reminding me of the previous discussion. It closed with no consensus. I see that SMcCandlish asked to be pinged if ever a rename was proposed again. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:27, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The template has been in used for well over three years now, and as far as I can tell, there has never been confusion over the title. Concerning the comment that there are other types of series: book series, sports series, is there a Book series overview or Sports series overview? No? Then no such other series exist that require an overview. --  Alex TW 02:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * There are a large number of templates with "series" in the name. All but this one specify the type of series; for example, Infobox book series, Series (mathematics) Infobox baseball championship series, Mega Man series, DJMax series, Koei Tecmo's Warriors series, Pac-Man series, NHL series, Video game series reviews, The Challenge series invitation, I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (UK TV series), Grand Prix Super Series tournaments, Community (TV series). No reason why this template is different to the rest in this regard has been given. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:42, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * And no overviews. If the template was simply called "Series", then yes, I would support a move to "Television series". But it is not. --  Alex TW 10:49, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Support - The word "series" is indeed not an only-television word and has been an argument that has been used against editors of WP:NCGAMES for them using it for disambiguation without the additional phrase "video game". The addition of "Television" will make the name more WP:PRECISE and more WP:CONSISTENT with other templates that identify their scope (including other television templates). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonnym (talk • contribs) 14:26, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The title of this template has never been a problem, not before the last RM and not since. The proposed name is unnecessarily lengthy and I don't see how it would be an improvement. This should NEVER have been listed as an uncontroversial technical request since the move is clearly controversial and the nominator should know this since he was the nominator at the previous, failed, RM discussion. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 18:00, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose. In addition to the comments above, this template is also used for digital and streaming series, so don't see any reason nor benefit to concentrating the template's scope in this way. Also, that the nominator, a longstanding Wikipedia editor, re-requested this template for a page move as 'noncontroversial' is pretty absurd. --  Wikipedical (talk) 18:44, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Neutral - My !vote is neutral here as I became aware of this discussion from WT:TV and the nom is worried about WP:CANVASS as such my comments here are my own and should not be taken into account when this discussion is closed due to canvassing concerns. Had I would come across this discussion on my own or had left a neutral Please see message on WT:TV about this discussion then I would have supported the move for consistency reasons since other templates that relate to TV have "Television" in the name. However  as the nominator should have left a neutral message over at WT:TV especially after this discussion was called out for similar canvassing concerns to prevent this discussion being plagued from similar issues.    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    21:59, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * No canvassing occurred on or for this discussion. Notifying WikiProjects is completely acceptable. --  Alex TW 02:27, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Had I said that "notifying WikiProjects is canvassing" you may have had a point. You are aware of WP:CANVASS from previous discussions. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:28, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * No canvassing occurred on or for this discussion. Notifying WikiProjects is completely acceptable. --  Alex TW 10:29, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * You can repeat your lie as often as you like; the truth is clear for all to see. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:42, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Accusing somebody of lying is highly inappropriate; Please comment on content, not on the contributor. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 10:59, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Indeed it is: an editor is unable to quote any part of the policy to support their claim of a violation. No canvassing in my lobby! --  Alex TW 10:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Neutral per User:Alucard 16's reasoning, the failure to notify the proper wiki-projects has been an issue with me. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:17, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose per others. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:10, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose per above. BattleshipMan (talk) 06:39, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Support. I'd forgotten the original discussion.  When I saw this come up [again] I wasn't certain what it meant. "Series of what?"  There are lots of series of things and people do not always read template documentation.  Besides, the argument "we only use this for TV" is silly, since anyone could at any time create a similar template for video game or novel series. Might even be useful. E.g., the Final Fantasy VG franchise is a sprawling mess across many gaming platforms and table that presented them with columns for release dates, systems, etc., would be useful. For many years now, we've been moving templates (at least those used in mainspace) to much clearer names, and preserving template shortcuts to them.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  08:49, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose: solution looking for a problem, but there is no problem. —Joeyconnick (talk) 09:01, 20 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Special doesn't go till 13
I was editing a page where I used the following template. When I went to go add a special season between seasons 13 and 14 it comes up as 13S instead of just S. Help? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Good_Mythical_Morning_episodes#Series_overview --Nobo71-Wikipedia.org 18:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nobo71 (talk • contribs)
 * You need to change the link text. See what I did. -- / Alex /21  22:56, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Row scope
The row scope should be changed from the colored cell to the season number, as the colored cell offers no assistance with a screen reader. See Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Accessibility for more info. --Gonnym (talk) 09:53, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Sandbox edited - can see the differences on the testcases. --Gonnym (talk) 16:15, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Aired and released?
Hi. Would there be a way to have a series overview box that includes both aired and released? For example, Money Heist was aired on Spanish TV for its first two parts, but then the third part will be released all at once by Netflix in the upcoming week. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:18, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * It seems that "parts" in this sense are just a stylistic choice used instead of the word "season". Looking at Netflix's page, the episode numbers starts at 1 for each "part", that is one sign that these are clearly seasons, unlike Vikings (season 5), which continue with the numbering between parts. Now while this still can be argued if parts 1 and 2 are two seasons, there is no denying that part 3 is separated, as it comes out over 2 years later. This means that there is no need for your change, as it shouldn't be in the same table. --Gonnym (talk) 15:20, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Part 3 is still part of the first season though, that’s how they’ve been doing this for this show. Are there any shows where they had a TV run and then went to Netflix after a couple seasons - in this case the continual heading of aired won’t be fully correct anymore as the Netflix seasons should be under released - unless you’re saying to have a second table. Vaselineeeeeeee</b>★★★ 16:33, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Broken table
Pinging you two because you usually seem to know what you're doing with tables anyways any idea what's up with the table over at List of Big Brother (American TV series) episodes (2010–present)?? Used to be fine but appears that the data has stopped automatically spanning across rows, does it just need to be manually entered for each season (don't mind doing it if it needs it, just not sure if it's something on the back-end)? The Doctor Who (talk) 02:11, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 * , I know what the issue is. Fixing it now. -- / Alex /<sub style="color:#008">21  02:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Multi-series InfoX rowspan?
Can rowspans be enabled for "infoX" info when the template is used for multiple series? I'm specifically looking at Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Four, and how rowspans should be used in the "Status" column for the Disney+ series currently. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 07:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I did look into this, but the answer is not really. The reason is because each separate Series overview template inside the greater multi-series wrapper is a separate template that cannot "speak" to each other template calls. Exactly the same how the contents of one Episode list cannot modify the contents of another Episode list, or how Episode list would never be able to automatically increment EpisodeNumber/EpisodeNumber2 based on how many episodes came before it; templates don't "talk" to each other between calls. There isn't an automatic way, for example, for the Hawkeye template to know that infoA has to span exactly four rows, and for the Ms. Marvel, Moon Knight and She-Hulk templates to not include infoA. -- / Alex /<sub style="color:#008">21  07:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Favre1fan93, It also has accessibility issues as I've already pointed out to you in a different thread. --Gonnym (talk) 10:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Another broken table
Can someone explain or fix what's wrong with the series overview table in List of Money Heist episodes, please? The network column appears broken up into two columns in all edits of the past month, so I believe a change to this template caused this. – sgeureka t•c 15:30, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , ✅ -- / Alex /<sub style="color:#008">21  22:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Links don't work
When this is on an overview page and is transcluded back to a series home page, the internal links do not work. See Happy Days. The links that refer to an item "on this page" are on the wrong page and go nowhere.Trackinfo (talk) 00:14, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , fixed. In the overview, you need to include the link to the episodes article itself, as well as the season-section anchors, not just the latter (see here). -- / Alex /<sub style="color:#008">21  00:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Question about column order
Taking List of Rusty Rivets episodes as an example, is there anyway to list an auxilary column like the 'Segments' column there after the 'Episodes' column rather than before? In general, I think it would be advantageous to have the ability to put a column in between 'Episodes' and the air dates column, but none of the examples in the documentation show this option. Thanks in advance. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:21, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , sorry for the late response. That's because there are no available parameters for between the Aux and Episodes cells, at the moment. However, I could certainly add this sort of feature. Three ways to implement it have crossed my mind:
 * We keep the pre-Episodes aux cells and Episodes column as they are, and introduce post-Episode aux cells as well. In this case, if pre-Episodes aux parameters are titled auxA, what would you suggest we title the post-Episodes aux parameters? postauxA?
 * We introduce a parameter to optionally hide the Episodes column, and we just use aux cells for all of the pre-aux, Episodes, and post-aux content (so, using y, Segements, Episodes, Stories).
 * We introduce a parameter to optionally toggle where the aux cells are displayed, either before or after the Episode column (so by default, it would display as aux then episodes, but y would display the table as episodes then aux).
 * Thoughts? -- / Alex /<sub style="color:#008">21  00:09, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * So, I can answer with the specific context I'm thinking of is those animated TV series that broadcast "episodes" that are made up of two or more "segments" (e.g. SpongeBob SquarePants). In a case like this, it would make sense for the column order to be 'Season', 'Episodes' and then 'Segment'. But, right now because the auxA parameter comes before the 'Episodes' column, series overview tables including segments are listing them in the order of: 'Season', 'Segment' and then 'Episodes' (e.g. SpongeBob SquarePants). Now, how to "code" for the former arrangement is above my pay grade (though I do like your third suggestion). But I do suggest that allowing for a column between 'Episodes' and the 'Air dates' columns would be desirable for scenarios like the animated TV series. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:20, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , done! I went with the third suggestion and y. Although, come to think of it, I might implement one of the first two suggestions at a later date, as another similar example is List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present), where the order should be Era/Doctor, then Episodes, then Serials (so Aux-Episodes-Aux). So I've gone with the first suggestion, actually. -- / Alex /<sub style="color:#008">21  01:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * As an outsider commenter in this, would it be easier to simply make a new "segments/serials" parameter, so you use that instead of an aux? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:32, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * My guess is that the answer to that depends on how often it would be used... It will come up a fair amount with animated TV series. But, aside from those?... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I count 65 articles that use a Segments column. -- / Alex /<sub style="color:#008">21  03:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Was just a thought if it'd be helpful/cleaner to have a dedicated parameter over using the aux. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:28, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Specials & auxiliary columns
I'm running into an issue when trying to update the series overview table at Draft:List of Critical Role episodes so it includes the RPG one-shots under the "specials" category while also using the auxiliary columns. Under the auxiliary column "Party", I've tried both aux3S = One-shots (following the naming convention of specials) & auxA3 = One-shots (following the naming convention of specials). But neither works and I'm not entirely sure how to fix it. Thanks! Sariel Xilo (talk) 05:14, 10 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Fixed it for you. It's always "aux[letter][season number]"; the aux letter is "A", the season number here is "3S", so the parameter is auxA3S. Hope that helps! -- / Alex /<sub style="color:#008">21  06:00, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much! Sariel Xilo (talk) 06:06, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Design discussion
There is currently a discussion concerning the design of this template over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television. - adamstom97 (talk) 20:10, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Caption
Is it just me or adding a custom caption to be read by anyone is not possible anymore because it defaults to screen reader-only? Heartfox (talk) 20:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I thought when the screen reader only template was added, the flag parameter show_caption was added too, but that doesn't seem to be the case. That should definitely be added so the caption can be made visible if needed. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Articles using Template:Series overview with empty start date
Category:Articles using Template:Series overview with empty start date does not seem to be set in the module anywhere. Was this accidently removed or no longer needed? --Gonnym (talk) 14:29, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

TBA
This table include the unexplained acronym TBA. I might know it stands for "To Be Announced" but there are always new readers or people who don't have English as their first language reading so can we get a Abbreviation tag for that for accessibility and clarity, please? -- 109.76.202.168 (talk) 05:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Discussion on changing colors from HTML to CSS
There is currently at discussion at WT:TV proposing that the color column be changed from HTML to CSS. The discussion can be found here. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:52, 20 May 2022 (UTC)


 * ✅ -- Alex_ 21 TALK 00:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)