Template talk:Sitelink

Substability
, do you think you could add substability? Sitelink is now being called from Needtrans, but although that one is subst-protected, since this one is not, the code that comes out looks like what you see in my sandbox here. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 03:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Hold off on this; we might not need it. Mathglot (talk) 04:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

I went ahead and created a sandbox version and tested it, and it looked good to me. There were no test cases, so I tested live at WP:PNT using the transcluding template Needtrans which previously had problems because of missing subst protection here, but looked good transcluding the sandbox version here instead. After reverting the test, I released the sandbox to live. However, I'm not familiar with most of the functions of this template, and wasn't able to test properly, so if you or anyone sees any problems, please let me know. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 03:40, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @Mathglot: I'm not familiar with the other template and have no idea what the problem was, but sitelink seems to be working as it should and I'm OK with the changes. Ponor (talk) 04:14, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 04:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)