Template talk:Slavic-language terms for administrative divisions

Template name concerns
''The following announcement and subsequent discussion were copied from Portal:Russia/New article announcements. I am seeking comments regarding this template's name.&mdash;Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)''


 * Template:Slavic terms for country subdivisions by User:Tobias Conradi. The criterion for this assortment is not clear. For instance, there is obshchina, but no mir (social), pogost or khutor. -- Ghirla -трёп-  07:57, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Mir and khutor do not qualify, as technically they were not "subdivisions", but rather inhabited localities. I added pogost, though.  Thanks.&mdash;Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Still, it is very strange to see "raion" and "selsoviet" listed among traditional "Slavic terms". -- Ghirla -трёп-  18:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Agree. The way this template is constructed now, the name of "Terms for subdivisions of Slavic countries" would be more appropriate.  On a different note, why did you remove "powiat" and deitalicized "pogost" (which is a historical term)?&mdash;Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed. -- Ghirla -трёп-  18:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Silrada
Silrada is not a historic subdivision, but present time one.--Tomakiv (talk) 06:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

"Darugha"
Altough according to article this term was used in Russian Empire, I have a great doubts that it is correct to say that darugha is a Slavic term. Altes (talk) 18:22, 5 April 2010 (UTC)