Template talk:SockpuppetCheckuser

Revert war
OK, enough revert warring; I've locked The Wrong Version. Please hash out your differences here and reach some form of consensus. -- Avi 23:16, 2 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I personally prefer the version in use since April 2007. It is simpler, standardized, and reduces redundancy by using the flexible template. Is there any particular reason the hardcoded version (which PitOfBristol1973 is reverting to) is better? — {admin} Pathoschild 23:56:23, 02 August 2007 (UTC)  Actually, I'll just revert based on Nard's comment below. — {admin} Pathoschild 23:58:34, 02 August 2007 (UTC)

Revert sockpuppet
-Nard 23:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC)}}


 * Done. — {admin} Pathoschild 23:58:34, 02 August 2007 (UTC)

One problem I noticed
When you link to a specific Checkuser case, an extra period is added. See here for an example. "...Checkuser request. for evidence."  Enigma  message 05:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Fixed :) (for now I've even reverted to the previous version, I think having the complete expression linked is superior). -- lucasbfr  talk 09:24, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

This template is now redundant
Once you write up a checkuser case, just add to the page. It will automagically create a link to the checkuser case. - LA @ 16:12, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Template overhaul planned
Please see Template talk:Sockpuppet -- Avi (talk) 18:17, 26 March 2009 (UTC)