Template talk:Sockpuppet category/suspected

Edit request
Can you please change "which" to "that", so that this template displays the correct grammar. "Which" must be preceded by a comma; if it cannot be, it should read "that". --IWI (talk) 16:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done DannyS712 (talk) 18:21, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 25 June 2021
Per WP:HSOCK, which states that Only blocked accounts should be tagged as Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets and only upon sufficient evidence that would stand up to scrutiny., please replaceTo add an account that has not been confirmed by a CheckUser, use if the account has not been blocked or if the account has been blocked.withTo add a sockpuppet to this category, use. To add an account that has not been confirmed by a CheckUser, use.Thanks. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 20:36, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * For the second sentence, why that, rather than ?  -- Tamzin  (she/they) &#124; o toki tawa mi. 20:47, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * @Tamzin Oh, I'm sorry, I messed up. The correct wording is  --Blablubbs&#124;talk 20:48, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Follow-up question, then, is why does that need to be noted?  adds them to a different category, right?  -- Tamzin  (she/they) &#124; o toki tawa mi. 21:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Fair point. I'm only filing this request because of the HSOCK violation and I'm not super familiar with category headers and what they should contain, but I have no objections to removal if you think it's unnecessary. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 21:02, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I've replaced the previous wording with your first sentence. As to the second, I'm not opposed to that, but probably could use a bit of discussion (or at least silent consensus) first. Also, it should take into account whether Sockpuppet category/confirmed should have a corresponding reference to how to tag a suspected sock.
 * Two side-notes: One, still waiting to hear back at WT:CHK what the proper capitalization of "[Cc]heck[Uu]ser" is. Input welcome. Two, to further emphasize the policy you cited, it might be worth discussing at Template talk:Sockpuppet whether the parameter should be renamed to  instead of   (with backwards-compatibility).  -- Tamzin  (she/they) &#124; o toki tawa mi. 21:12, 25 June 2021 (UTC)