Template talk:Spellnum per MOS

Duplicate
I haven't investigated this new module to see what features it has, but Module:ConvertNumeric is well tested and widely used. Johnuniq (talk) 00:06, 15 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks ; I wasn't aware of Module:ConvertNumeric or the templates that use it (I looked, but categorization was lacking), but it looks like my module does something important that Module:ConvertNumeric doesn't: it applies the guidance of WP:NUMERAL to decide when a number should be given as text. I'd be fine piggybacking off the existing module to do that. Maybe this module should be renamed to make the distinction clear: what about "ConvertNumericPerMOS"?. — swpb T go beyond 13:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Agreed that it can be hard to find things. I'm not sure about the name, I just wanted to point out that the other module exists. Johnuniq (talk) 22:52, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 5 November 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 06:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

– Match name with template * Pppery * it has begun... 22:29, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Module:ConvertNumericPerMOS → Module:Spellnum per MOS
 * Support per nom. --Gonnym (talk) 07:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Support. — swpb T&#8201;•&#8201;go beyond&#8201;•&#8201;bad idea 14:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Handling large numbers
It looks like this template isn't capable of handling large numbers, i.e. 47,000,000 -> 47million. Could someone program that capability in? Sdkb (talk) 10:32, 10 March 2020 (UTC)