Template talk:Spf

Broken template
I've removed all uses of this template, as it doesn't correctly produce links. The date is duplicated and so can't link with the cite correctly. Where it's used with spfref the link will work, but it still causes a false positive. As the same function could be produced using sfnref and '' it's use doesn't seem worthwhile. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 13:51, 16 February 2023 (UTC)