Template talk:Stubsort

Untitled
&#123;{stub}} isn't deprecated, is it? We should encourage users to do stub-sorting themselves, sure, but a lazy user who adds &#123;{stub}} is still better than a user who does nothing when they stumble on an extremely short article. Should we really discourage users from using it? --Interiot 00:03, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Point taken. I changed the message accordingly. Where (talk) 00:05, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Template redone
I've redone the template with the following changes: Please discuss. &mdash; jmorgan (talk) 18:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Addresses the user by username
 * Explains the benefits of stub types
 * Points to further resources about stubs

changed
I edited the template slightly to use tl2 instead of using a bunch of HTML code tags. I also moved the... notice... into a notice ambox, since that's what it's for. Ω (talk) 04:12, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Merge
I'd like to propose merging this template into Stub sort or the other way around. Anyone got a strong preference? Gosox(55)(55) 23:32, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Notification of RfC affecting this page
Village pump (proposals). -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 10:11, 6 April 2018 (UTC)