Template talk:Superbonked

Replaced with Template:Bonked
The new yes parameter in Bonked produces the same output formerly produced by this template. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  20:58, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Because it's really, really central to our mission, that six editors can tell us they are "superbonked", and not merely "bonked"... Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * As a BrE speaker, I was quite unsure what the message of this template was the first time. Alakzi (talk) 16:40, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * "BrE speaker" - please clarify. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  18:11, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * British English. Alakzi (talk) 18:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Indeed. "Bonking" is something else entirely for some people &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh. Ah.  I see now.  Thankfully the template provides enough context so it's clear the, um, NSFW meaning isn't what is meant here.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  20:15, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The template provides no context, and is most likely opaque to more than 50% of editors. It serves no useful purpose. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:24, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The context of "hit the wall" clearly dovetails with the meaning of "collide with/hit/be hit", see bonked and bonk. The meaning is probably very clear to 90% of American-English readers.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  22:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC)  Update:  If you are referring to "superbonked", no, that isn't a word, but its meaning is clear to anyone who reads the template and who knows what "bonked" means in the United States.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  22:33, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Attribution history must be kept
Due to the merger with Template:Bonked on 2015-09-07, it is necessary to preserve the edit history of Template:Bonked for attribution purposes. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  21:03, 7 September 2015 (UTC)