Template talk:Template group

possible high-risk template?
No actual history of vandalism, but might it be worth sprotect? &mdash; Alan✉ 09:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Titlebar background
What about white? It stands out but doesn't insist upon itself. --Joowwww (talk) 19:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I've "been bold" and implemented it. Let's see what people think... Sardanaphalus (talk) 10:27, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Overlapping
Sometime in the past couple of weeks this template has started overlapping with other templates, something it didn't do before. See the bottom of the Hong Kong article. Is there a fix for this? Many thanks --Joowwww (talk) 17:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I think so, but as this template is protected:


 * Please insert a  between the initial   and   as this should handle the problem described above (hopefully satisfactorily). Sardanaphalus (talk) 01:35, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. Seems to work alright. I'm going to keep an eye on this since I'd like to find out if the cat params are used at all. --- RockMFR 01:58, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Sardanaphalus (talk) 01:59, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Extra space
Take out, it's creating extra space, and double spacing which is a WP:MOS violation.24.65.69.8 (talk) 01:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I say that "extra" line is useful as it detaches the group of templates from whatever precedes it (usually a list of external links or references). If that's an MoS violation, let's violate. Sardanaphalus (talk) 18:12, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Redirect to Navboxes
This template should be redirected to navboxes which forces collapsed behaviour and makes the groups alot clearer Gnevin (talk) 16:27, 27 October 2008 (UTC) Gnevin (talk) 16:27, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree. It has been a few months and noone has commented, but there shouldn't be much change, if any once this is done anyway.

#REDIRECT Template:Navboxes
 * Thanks! ~ Paul T +/C 23:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * This template has state parameter that is not supported by Navboxes. Do you really want to abolish it? Ruslik (talk) 19:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I just made the required changes on the Navboxes talk page to allow for the state parameter to pass correctly. I'm not sure how I missed that difference.  There is no reason why it shouldn't at least be an option.  Thanks for alerting me!  The list parameter correctly passes now so there is no technical reason this redirect wouldn't work as expected once the state parameter is passed as well.  ~ Paul T +/C 16:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ Ruslik (talk) 18:03, 8 January 2009 (UTC)