Template talk:Template journal

&lt;syntaxhighlight> and code style
I appreciate the effort, but two three caveats: Jack who built the house (talk) 23:36, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
 * 1)  has learned to produce a similar output, hasn't it? What is the rationale then? :  tj:I assume it's a template link. But at the cost of lost highlighting inside the parameters. Anyways, I think, this should be mentioned in the docs.
 * 2) The code style with tabs seems unusual to me. First of all, you can't type it in the text editing area – tabs are unsupported there. Then, the conventional code style seems to be this:
 * 3) Another thing I'm skeptical about is the conflict with the notation where variable content is italicized (including using ), and actual content is roman, for example:  vs.


 * @Jack who built the house: I rather like this concept and though there are some minor similarities with things like o, I feel they are quite different concepts. I suppose one could use a construction like where content was created on the fly, removing the need for the separate s, however, as far I know there is no way to use any sort of wikitext markup within a parser extension tag/strip marker. They render their provided content however they see fit so using  or other means of italicizing, etc. is likely not possible within such a context. That said, it seems like a good idea to rewrite the entire thing along with  and Template journal parameter directly in Scribunto Lua. It seems sort of pointless to do this in wikitext when it heavily depends on:  and  and in the subtemplates Template journal/arg and Template journal inline/arg:, ,  and . In summary, I disagree with your first point and definitely agree with the subsequent two points. I am not a fan of the proscribed spacing and as much as the arguments can be italicized, I do not think it should be automatically italicized but rather such should be provided by the wikitext author employing the likes of var, var serif, etc. —Uzume (talk) 10:44, 2 June 2024 (UTC)