Template talk:Timeline MediaWiki

Development information
Hi, this chart is great. Actually I was thinking of doing this too, but timeline was too much voodoo for me right know. I think the information on development (grey) should be dropped from here, since this is not of interest for general audience. However on mediawiki.org itself, it would be alight. Cheers --&#91;&#91;kgh&#93;&#93; (talk) 19:54, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi!
 * It's been a long time since I made the first draft, so I'm not sure why exactly I added both "Current" and "Stable". Anyway, since I mentioned Template:Timeline Fedora Linux in my edit summaries I think the gray is as valid as in that other timeline.
 * Feel free to improve this one.
 * Maybe we could create one for the MediaWiki roadmaps which are on mediawiki.org? I think that table is starting to be very redundant. A timeline would be better, in my opinion. Helder 20:31, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Heiya, I am not here that often, so my reply took me this long. Yeah, since the development is included on other timelines too over here, it seems to be very well valid. I was a good idea to create a timeline for the roadmap on mediawikiwiki. You know this already. :) Cheers --&#91;&#91;kgh&#93;&#93; (talk) 21:48, 5 July 2012 (UTC)