Template talk:Tom Clancy games

italics
Why does this template need to be written in italics? It's really hard to read on my browser-- 3000zebs  -(talk to me)  18:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Template incomplete
In my opinion the list, is wether complete nor logic. Some Add-Ons are featured, but not all. Why has half of the Add-Ons got an own article, and the other half hasnt? Every Add-On that already has an own article, should get a link in here, and maybe the Add-Ons that haven't should get one, too.

This are the Add-Ons I mean:

Rainbow Six 1 + 1 Add-On

Rainbow Six 2 + 3 Add-Ons

Rainbow Six 3 + 2 PC-Add-Ons + 1 Console Add-On

Ghost Recon + 1 Add-On + 2 more Add-Ons

I am no coder, so my try looks a bit weird:

Tom Clancy games

--ChrisJG 11:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

EndWar
Should EndWar be another section, like rainbow six, ghost recon, and splinter cell?  J- stan  Talk 21:25, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * no - as soon as it becomes a new series/franchise it will get its own section, but it might end up as a flop which could lead to discontinuation of the Story. That'd basically throw it into the Others section again. Leave in there for now. --ChrisJG 10:16, 23 July 2007 (UTC)


 * yes - My vote is it should be its own section. It is a ground breaking game, and is the first of its kind on next gen consoles. Future game developers will enjoy the information (like me).  I agree that it may flop, but so far, with the interest I've seen thus far, it looks like alot of people will still play it, regardless.  We may know what will happen. when the stress test begins on September 30th.  I will try and keep you posted on the status, as I am a member of the test.  I vote, make the section, and see what happens.  Odds are, it will take off, so, why put off what you can do now. AndrewWN (talk) 23:33, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Takedown - Missions in Korea
Should I leave it out of the infobox? Ominae 01:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)