Template talk:Tor (anonymity network)

Don't remove redirects
an others, please don't remove redirects, they're important as in list of notable software. --Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 12:58, 13 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Well, you are wrong, the navboxes are to navigate between articles, NOT to highlight multiple topics covered in a single article. If the software was notable enough, it would have its own article, and if the section on the software is in an entirely different article not already listed in the navbox, then linking to that article section is fine. however, i am now really tired of the silliness around Tor, so i wont bother to edit any more. others can try to sort out whats happening. Im sure whatever is worked out will be fine, i am not going to worry about it any more. thanks for your passion in trying to document this stuff, sorry i dont agree based on my understanding of policy.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 20:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Please see my talk on this subject. --Rezonansowy (talk &bull; contribs) 14:56, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Expand template?
Not looking to make Template:Tor hidden services redundant, but it seems like some of the things that links to would be more appropriate here (or also appropriate): .onion, for example. List of Tor hidden services (the article) seems to also make sense to include somewhere but it doesn't quite fit in either of the existing sections. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  21:36, 25 June 2014 (UTC)