Template talk:US-airport-mil

WHy are there two links to weather observations???
There is some... erm... stupidity going on with the whole linking of supposedly "current" observations and "historical" observations from NOAA. That stupidity is the fact that the "current" link goes back a day, while the supposed "historical" link goes back... you'll never believe this... 3 days! I suggest STRONGLY that the "current" link be dumped and the "historical" link be called simply "weather observations from NOAA"... the current linking structure is, IMHO, false advertising.Famartin 03:07, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * With no debate to the contrary, I have removed the duplications. Famartin 10:44, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

any objections to adding a link to NOTAMs
Examples:
 * http://www.globalair.com/airport/apt.notams.aspx?aptcode=WAL
 * https://pilotweb.nas.faa.gov/PilotWeb/radiusSearchAction.do?formatType=ICAO&geoIcaoLocId=KWAL&geoIcaoRadius=5&openItems=&actionType=radiusSearch

I'm a bit partial to the FAA one (2nd one) as it's a more reliable source and looks better organized to me but am open to discussion of course.

This is appropriate for military airports as notams involving military exercises, VIP movement, and in the case of KWAL, KVBG, KCOF, and KXMR for rocket launches.--RadioFan (talk) 12:37, 11 April 2013 (UTC)