Template talk:USAF transports

C-36
Could you please explain why you reinstated original research in this edit? While some sources do state that the the C-36 may have been the YAL-1, I have yet to see one make a definitive claim that it was, and I've also yet to see any which state that "there is literally no other candidate for the description than the YAL-1." such a statement is purely original research and speculation. For all we know, it could have been a precursor, competitor, or maybe even an entirely unrelated classified project. As of yet, the evidence that the YAL-1 and C-36 are the same is circumstantial, and no reliable sources claim that they are. - ZLEA  T \ C 02:23, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Because WP:COMMONSENSE - and also WP:BLUE. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I fail to see how WP:COMMONSENSE or WP:BLUE apply in this case, especially since there are a number of other plausible explanations for the YFC-36 designation. No reliable sources state that the YFC-36 and YAL-1 are the same, so WP:BLUE is out the window.  I've tagged the "C-36" designation as unconfirmed, but the link remains for now. -  ZLEA  T \ C 13:27, 11 May 2022 (UTC)