Template talk:Unblock on hold

Proposed new look
 This user request to be unblocked is on hold
 * Blocking administrator:
 * Reviewing administrator:

class="plainlinks">[ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock])
 * User: ( This user request to have their autoblock removed is on hold
 * Blocking administrator:
 * Reviewing administrator:

class="plainlinks">[ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock])
 * User: (<span style="font-size:0.9em;"
 * Autoblock log entry :
 * IP Address blocked :

After the blocking administrator has left a comment, please replace this template with the following template:

And this is what Unblock-auto on hold would look like. mechamind 9  0  21:16, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Clock icons
This template currently uses File:Orologio oro.svg, which is licensed with an attribution-required license so a link to the source page at Wikimedia Commons is required. There is a CC0 version of this icon which don't require any attribution or link at File:Appointment yellow.svg. Any objections to switching this template (as well as Template:Unblock-un on hold and Template:Unblock-auto on hold) over to the slightly different public-domain version of this icon? --Ahecht (TALK PAGE ) 15:46, 14 September 2019 (UTC) PAGE ]]) 01:32, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ since there were no objections after a week. --Ahecht ([[User talk:Ahecht|TALK

"Reason" parameter should not have an effect on the heading
The heading says by default: "This user's unblock request is on hold because the reviewer is waiting for a comment by the blocking administrator." -- There is pretty much no imaginable reason for changing this text, as this is exactly the purpose of the template. Any detailed explanations can be given below the unblock request.

The "reason" parameter, used by the blocked user to describe the reason for their appeal in unblock, should not have an effect on the heading of unblock on hold. It currently overwrites the default heading, which makes no sense at all.

I'll rename the "reason" parameter to "heading" if there are no objections in the next months. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I've updated that case to hold-reason. reason was also used for 2. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 04:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Question
Is there a template that indicates that one is reviewing an unblock request pending a response from the appellant? I know there's Unblock on hold for if we're pending a response from blocking admin, and that when that template is used an individual unblock is highlighted at CAT:UNBLOCK, but I can't find one for the case where I'm merely waiting on the blocked person to respond. If not, would it be a decent idea to add such functionality to this template? I think that this would be useful, as it would reduce the amount of clicking on unblock request entries only to see that others are already handling them. I can get working on a draft template if this might be worthwhile — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 15:43, 12 January 2024 (UTC)