Template talk:User recursively neutral

I think the smaller size makes it even funnier (and it also fits in with most other userboxes' heights). Wouldn't you agree? &mdash; Nightst a  llion  (?) 07:24, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * No! The smaller size makes it too difficult to read... -- Nikodemos 21:34, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * That's the point. If you want a readable version, use the "normal" one. &mdash; Nightst a  llion  (?) 08:12, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but I wasn't aware that you own this template. If you want an unreadable version, create your own rather than editing the one that other people use. -- Nikodemos 22:17, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

This is a rather silly thing to argue about. Perhaps compromise with a 7-point font? --Mr. Billion 05:01, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
 * shrugs If you insist; I was under the impression that this template was meant to be silly, not readable, and that editors who wish to express their neutrality readably would simply employ the "normal" version. &mdash; Nightst a  llion  (?) 09:16, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The template is meant to be funny, and nothing is funny if you can't read it. Perhaps we should just make a poll and invite everyone who uses this template to vote. -- Nikodemos 23:05, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, you can read it after you turn the font size up. But yes, we could and should do that, probably. &mdash; Nightst a  llion  (?) 09:52, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

I changed the background color on the image to white so the scales don't look so cut-and-paste. I hope nobody minds--if you do, go ahead and change it back, no discussion necessary. I just think it looks a little neater this way. Aelffin 13:03, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Your browser must display stuff differently than mine. You saw white space around the scales?  Is that it?  In this version, I see the scales on the same background as the rest of the left side of the box--no white.  If your change fixes the problem for you, though, then that's fine.  --Mr. Billion 13:40, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmmm. That's odd. Must be the browser. On my browser, the old version you linked has scales surrounded by white, with two broad bands of dark pink above and below. Aelffin 16:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Yep, that's it. Using Firefox, there's no problem. I just tried viewing it in Internet Explorer and got the same thing you described. --Mr. Billion 06:48, 16 August 2006 (UTC)