Template talk:Utilitarianism

Template failure
This template is no longer floating on the right side of the page like it used to: e.g. Rule utilitarianism. It is thus breaking the many pages it appears on. Singinglemon (talk) 22:39, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Works here. What browser are you using? Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 17:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Still looks broken to me. I'm using Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.20. Singinglemon (talk) 13:39, 29 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I've decided just to flatten the template out and present it in one column. Should be fixed now. Can you check? Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:27, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * It looks fine now, it's floating correctly to the right. I should have explained more clearly that the problem was that the box was floating in the middle of the page. I've had a good look at the edit history and the edit which caused it to happen was this one: . Singinglemon (talk) 18:16, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Animal welfare
I'm not sure why animal welfare is linked to from this template. There is a kind of link, as can be seen in the quote from Robert Nozick in the section Animal welfare. But putting animal welfare in the template seems like giving the connection undue weight.

Yaris678 (talk) 15:04, 23 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I am also dubious about the inclusion of Abolitionism (bioethics). This is an interesting concept that can be argued from a utilitarian point of view, but I don't think it is really part of utilitarianism.  If no one replies soon, I will remove the links to both articles from the template.  Yaris678 (talk) 23:24, 26 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Both Animal welfare and Abolitionism (bioethics) have now been removed. Yaris678 (talk) 19:44, 31 January 2010 (UTC)