Template talk:Uw-ewpblock

Is there a reason that this can't be like uw-ewblock and just ride off uw-pblock? That'd seem to make the most sense to me. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 19:09, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * A bit confused about what exactly you're talking about. I'm logging out for the night and will be on-and-off till Saturday night, so if you want, you can change it how you see fit. --qedk (t 桜 c) 19:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * No worries! I wasn't trying to foist it all on you, sorry if it came off that way!  I only meant to discuss since we seem to be the only two...  What I meant was that uw-ewblock (and uw-ablock, etc.) call uw-block, which serves double-duty as a sort of meta-template for others, saving a lot of updating, etc..  I figured we could easily do the same for something like this and uw-apblock (and, as you suggested, things like uw-emailblock or uw-acblock).  I've just made that change here, swapping area instead of page and adding email and accountcreate.  It looks fine? ~  Amory  (u • t • c) 02:40, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Hahah, it's alright, I got you now. What I was wondering is if the email and accountcreate are necessary, edit-warring will not result in email/ac-block afterall (and they override area). --qedk (t 桜 c) 11:04, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Good point on the override — removed. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 11:53, 31 January 2020 (UTC)