Template talk:Uw-paid2

RFC about above edit request
I was instructed to establish a consensus for the change, hence this RFC. Firestar464 (talk) 04:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 * As an RfC statement, that is useless. See WP:RFCST and WP:RFCNEUTRAL, not to mention WP:WRFC. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 21:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 * An RfC really isn't necessary here and is as Redrose pointed out not how they're usually used. I've taken the liberty to remove it. As for the actual issue at hand I believe it's sensible to remove references to previous warnings as skipping the first warning happens even though skipping the second or third usually is preferable. It also has no negative effect on people who got a previous warning. and Primefac are you fine with this change? If so I would consider that consensus enough and will implement it. --Trialpears (talk) 22:58, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Well... I don't disagree with the change but I asked for a consensus because I felt that this would require at least some discussion (see my reply above as to those concerns). An RFC is obviously not necessary, but a few more comments in the affirmative would be nice. Primefac (talk) 23:01, 8 December 2020 (UTC)