Template talk:Vcite journal

Convert to CS1-based template?
,, any chance of converting this one (and others in the vcite family) to make use of the CS1 base? It's lacking quite a few features, and its identifier handling is quite poor. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 02:39, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * As of this writing, the vcite suite has:
 * 237 transclusions
 * 329 transclusions
 * 105 transclusions
 * 208 transclusions
 * Hardly enough, I think to warrant the substantial effort that would be required to support them properly as cs1 templates even if there was a hue and cry from the editing populus to do so.
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 11:11, 25 March 2017 (UTC)


 * But wouldn't it simply just involve invoking the existing cite journal, and forcing vanc on? Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 14:24, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * No. This template has a rather large variety of parameters that are not supported by cs1|2:


 * author.
 * chapter.
 * chapteraccessdate
 * chapterid
 * chapterlanguage
 * chapterupdate
 * column
 * contenttype
 * editionphrase
 * editionphrase.
 * harvid
 * home
 * home.
 * homeaccessdate
 * homedate
 * homeedition
 * homeeditionphrase
 * homeeditionphrase.
 * homeformat
 * homelanguage
 * homenotes
 * homeupdate
 * homeurl
 * journal.
 * journalformat
 * notes
 * pagination
 * partid
 * partp
 * parttitle
 * parttitle.
 * parturl
 * physicaldescription
 * secondaryauthor
 * sectionphrase
 * serieseditor
 * seriesvolume
 * seriesvolumephrase
 * size
 * title.
 * trans_home
 * trans_parttitle
 * update
 * volumepagination
 * volumephrase
 * volumetitle
 * volumetitle.
 * work.
 * workformat


 * I don't know how many of those are actually used.
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 15:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

broken harv link reporting
Please see the discussion at where a broken harv-link reporting scheme is proposed.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 17:46, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vcite paper
Template:Vcite paper has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page.

"Template:Vcite paper" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:Vcite paper. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 2 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. User:GKFXtalk 21:57, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

"Template:Cit paper" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Cit_paper&redirect=no Template:Cit paper] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 15:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC)