Template talk:Visibility

statistically?... not needed
Please remove the term statistically; the remaining unlikely will suffice. I don’t expect we have done some research here on the probability of image talk pages views. --Van helsing (talk) 16:37, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ switched to "very unlikely"  MBisanz  talk 19:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Portals?
Do we need this for portals?

Regular portal talk pages are quite active, as are some subpages, such as Portal talk:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board and it's a bit annoying. I suggest portal talks are excluded from this contraption, however this works. Миша 13 22:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Agree with the above. In fact it would be nice if it were possible for editors to remove this from particular pages if they are watching them.--Kotniski (talk) 23:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Reword
Since for the moment we can't be sure whether any particular page is watched or not (see above thread), please reword the first sentence to something like: "Talk pages in this namespace are typically not watched by many users."--Kotniski (talk) 23:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|20px]] Done, with addition of relevant help links as well. { { Nihiltres | talk | log } } 05:39, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

editprotected Thanks:) But I think Namespace would be a better link than Help:Namespace, which is a rather technical page from Meta.--Kotniski (talk) 14:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 18:28, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Edit request
Please change the sentence Please consider visiting the Help desk or the village pump for a more prompt response to Please consider visiting the Help desk or the village pump for a quicker response Linking the pages and using 'quicker' instead of 'prompt'. Sungodtemple (talk) 22:38, 29 June 2021 (UTC)