Template talk:Who's Who

Subscription only?
Great new template! I'm fairly incompetent at template syntax, but have made a slight tweak. Should it have a subscription only note, as Template:ODNBweb has? Dsp13 (talk) 02:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Cheers. I suppose it should. Same would go for Template:Crockford DBD 18:37, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Website overhaul, December 2017
Hasn't broken this templates links (they redirect), but we could choose to implement either their new urls e.g. https://www.ukwhoswho.com/view/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.001.0001/ww-9780199540884-e-282438 or DOI links e.g. https://doi.org/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.282438 DBD 18:04, 6 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Hello I've added digital object identifiers as a parameter to this template, although sadly, many of these new DOIs appear to be broken. While your example above  works, many do not.  for example, Keith Bevens entry at:
 * http://www.ukwhoswho.com/view/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.001.0001/ww-9780199540884-e-289275 uses a broken


 * I've notified CrossRef of a handful of these via http://www.crossref.org/DOIComplaint, but there appear to be many more.


 * Thankfully though, the http://www.ukwhoswho.com site does show a preview of the articles for users that "do not currently have access to this article" which makes some Verifiability possible for users outside the paywall . Duncan.Hull (talk) 06:32, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Italics
I have made this change to put Who's Who and Who Was Who into italics, as is normal for book titles. It seems to work, but if I have upset any applecarts inadvertently then please do feel free to undo (and explain so I can avoid making the same mistake again). DuncanHill (talk) 15:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Who Was Who link
When the template is used to display Who Was Who, it links to Who's Who. Would it be possible to make it link to Who Was Who? I know this is a redirect, but it does take readers to the relevant section of the article. DuncanHill (talk) 15:35, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Stephen Hawking
is no longer aliveBashereyre (talk) 19:15, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

not showing any data on Fran Balkwill
i have added. it shows "",". Who's Who. ukwhoswho.com. A & C Black, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing plc. (subscription or UK public library membership required)". its doi @ https://doi.org/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.U4000437

i have updated "String required" only. what am i doing wrong ? Leela52452 (talk) 03:42, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * refers to, where several other things were done too. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 18:19, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * You only supplied one parameter, but Template:Who's Who shows that you need "three parameters, the bare minimum" - specifically . -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 18:23, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I think Duncan.Hull gave the impresion that parameter names can be omitted in [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Who%27s_Who/doc&diff=815467148&oldid=815358752]. But all parameters must be named. Unnamed parameters are ignored. would make a working link but you still need   and   to display text on the link. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:04, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I removed the invalid examples from the doc. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 21:52, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

hello  good morning !!!!! thank you for fixing this template and my mistake also. there was lot of text in reference and i have come across this in some article. using bare three minimum parameters works flawlessly and anybody can figure out by looking at title and doi in whos who website. Leela52452 (talk) 01:34, 14 April 2020 (UTC) any OTHER suggestion or critique is preferred here

✅ Leela52452 (talk) 13:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Website parameter
I removed this from the template, as it creates an unnecessary double listing of the source. For example: Has a link to the website and a link to our article on the publication (Who's Who (UK)). There does not seem to be any reason to have "ukwhoswho.com" listed as well.


 * The removal has recently been reverted. Can we agree to remove it to avoid this clutter? Cheers, Number   5  7  16:25, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello Distinguishing between URL and Website provides useful information, they are different parameters in Template:Cite book, in this case:
 * Website is for the domain name e.g. ukwhoswho.com
 * URL is for the full address e.g. ukwhoswho.com/view/article/oupww/whoswho/U50605

The domain name in the latter gets hidden by the link text (e.g. "CORRIE, Sir Owen Cecil Kirkpatrick") described in website. The domain name is useful here for distinguishing between other books with the same name (see Who's Who) but different domains, such as ukwhoswho.com and whoswho.com etc Duncan.Hull (talk) 17:10, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I still cannot see the point of listing the url of the website when we already have a direct link to the website (what are people expecting that link to be to?). It just looks like terrible formatting (the first time I saw this being used, I assumed it was an input error). Number   5  7  17:17, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * They are needed because the link and the domain name aren't the same thing, one gets italicised.com to give context, the other takes the reader directly to the source. Without it, the user has to mouseover the link to see the domain name. The same distinction is made in templates such as Template:Cite web, Template:Cite thesis and many others Duncan.Hull (talk) 17:41, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * OK, we're clearly not going to agree, so I'll start an RfC on whether this should be included or not to get some wider input. Number   5  7  17:55, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Template missing/empty '|title='
The template show  in CS1_errors Franz.wohlkoenig (talk) 13:23, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

proposed update
I have hacked the sandbox to make a template that uses Module:Template wrapper. Using Module:Template wrapper allows editors to use with all of the available cs1|2 parameters without the need to modify  so that those parameters can be supported. The examples from the ~/doc page have been copied as-is to the Template:Who's Who/testcases page so that you can compare current v. proposed.

Things that have changed:
 * 1) instead of, the proposal uses ; this is in keeping with similar wrapper templates (, etc)
 * 2) the publisher marketing fluff ("an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing plc") removed
 * 3) ukwhoswho.com removed; in the pending version of Module:Citation/CS1, work and its aliases will not be supported in and
 * 4) type is documented to take the single value ; the live version of the template does not recognize that parameter value – it does recognize the undocumented value  ; the proposal recognizes was and does not recognize online.
 * 5) *~640 articles using was
 * 6) *no articles using online
 * 7) the proposal template will accept a single parameter title; this is in keeping with similar wrapper templates (, etc) and will allow us to deprecate and ultimately remove support for surname and othernames

Things that should be done:
 * 1) deprecate surname and othernames; it is not necessary to make editors disassemble the Who's Who entry title just to have the template reassemble it
 * 2) move to ; this will allow  (and others) to read the  template wikitext looking for author/date/reference

Comments? Questions?

Without objection, I shall update the live template from the sandbox in about a week's time.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 16:06, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
 * There having been no commnet: updated.
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 13:52, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * In article namespace, I have replaced all use of surname and othernames with title and all use of accessed with access-date. As of the timestamp of this posting, this search in article namespace returned zero results as did this search.
 * I have hacked the sandbox to remove surname, othernames, and accessed. I also qualified entry-url and entry-url-access with id.  If id is empty or omitted, the template will not fill entry-url and entry-url-access so that title does not link to a 404 page.
 * Examples in ~/testcases. Without objection I will update this template in a few days.
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 23:24, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * There having been no comment: updated.
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 14:11, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 23:24, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * There having been no comment: updated.
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 14:11, 19 August 2023 (UTC)