Template talk:WikiProject Classical music

Replace code
edit protected Please replace with the code at Template:Classical/sandbox. Thanks! §hep  •   ¡Talk to me!  16:11, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅. Graham 87 07:13, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

MetaBanner
Would there be any objections or concerns to converting this banner to use Template:WPBannerMeta? Martin 21:25, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Please ask the Classical Music Project. Unfortunately no-one will see your question if you leave it here. -- Klein zach  07:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Why the change to this banner? Was the project told about it?
I see this banner has been moved by User:Happy-melon, see. Perhaps we can have an explanation? Was the project told about it? I can't see any post at the Classical Music Project. -- Klein zach  07:49, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Also, isn't this template protected? -- Klein zach  08:14, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Once again this has been changed without notice by User:Happy-melon and it now seems to be set to B class! -- Klein zach  23:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Revert, please
Can we revert to the Antandrus version of 18 October 2008? This was changed without informing or consulting the project and seems to have been screwed up. It now displays B class — at least on the template page. Thank you. -- Klein zach  04:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Can you explain exactly what is broken? From what I can see, everything is working okay. --- RockMFR 06:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Look at the Template:WikiProject Classical music. As explained above it now says B class. -- Klein  zach  06:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * ❌ This is a default style I've seen on many other templates converted to this meta template. The template isn't broken. Best, Peter Symonds ( talk ) 06:59, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Why doesn't this template assess?
I can't think of any reason why it shouldn't. So why has the assessment been turned off? Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 12:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Very simple. This project doesn't do assessments. -- Klein zach  00:51, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Lord Strad
I was hoping that you could help me out with something. I reviewed a new article Lord Strad, which appears to be the name that authors of the book Lord Strad of 1716 gave to a "missing" Stradivarius that has the initial history of the Messiah Stradivarius. Would you mind taking a look at the information I posted at Talk:Lord Strad - and the options, whether to delete the article altogether or rework the article as Lord Strad of 1716 with information from a The Strad magazine review of the book. Or, another option based upon your subject matter knowledge?-- CaroleHenson  ( talk ) 02:54, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 1 June 2019
Just bringing this template in line with other WikiProjects. See here for suggested changes (excluding the  bit). Also, the noinclude tag is redundant with now (as is the BANNER_NAME which derives it by default). qedk (t 桜 c) 11:03, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done DannyS712 (talk) 14:22, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Request to update documentation
Could someone please update the documentation to match the template parameters?
 * Basic usage:
 * Full usage:

Where is the documentation for this template? It doesn't seem to be at Template:WikiProject Classical music/doc. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 14:36, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The doc went west with . -- Red rose64 &#x1F98C; (talk) 15:32, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 * It seems like the auto-documentation feature of Module:WikiProject banner makes some assumptions that the class and importance/priority parameters are always going to exist, which is not the case with this template. It also currently assumes all task forces have acorresponding importance parameter.
 * I've made a change in the sandbox that checks all parameters before adding them - can you check to see if that's the right kind of change to address this issue?  Harryboyles  15:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 * It is supposed to be checking that already (in lines 556-557). I will check why it is not working properly here. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:11, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 * How's that looking now? &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me!  Harryboyles  17:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)