Template talk:WikiProject Department of Fun

Please change the image.
It's.....not "Fun". It's.....a turnoff. --Occono (talk) 14:38, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Your change made it look much better! Prapsnot (talk) 22:23, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much! :) Occono (talk) 22:51, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Can we have a Parser Function and a Custom mask?
Hi, I was thinking of adding this code and creating an importance scale so we can have a bot count all of our articles? Other than Namespaces, everything would either be a Stub or Bottom importance.

Of course, can always be undone! Prapsnot (talk) 22:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You'll all be happy to know that NONE of the above worked. However, there is now a Custom mask that makes all articles stub class, (namespaces are still namespaces)✅. There is also a custom hook that results in "Bottom" for ALL pages. The Department of Fun is officially running with scissors! Prapsnot (talk) 06:22, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 27 November 2023
Unfortunately, the Department of Fun is now inactive, according to it's page. Update the banner to show it's defunct status. {{textdiff| {{#invoke:WikiProject banner|main |PROJECT         = Department of Fun |PROJECT_LINK    = Wikipedia:Department of Fun | {{#invoke:WikiProject banner|inactive |PROJECT         = Department of Fun |PROJECT_LINK    = Wikipedia:Department of Fun }} 2603:8000:CD02:FC64:C1B7:AD0C:B84:9A69 (talk) 02:05, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
 * {{done}} Tollens (talk) 00:39, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Tollens, it looks like this was a troll request. The IP made the change to the project page shortly before requesting this. The project is still fairly active by WP standards. I will revert accordingly. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  {{sup|talk}} 00:56, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * {{ping|Sdkb}} It appears to be a completely different IP to me – the IP who made the change at WP:FUN was 2601:244:4e00:4b60:a5af:6832:7f2e:f888 more than a week ago. WT:FUN also shows no signs of activity. Tollens (talk) 00:59, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * No objection to the revert though – if people believe it is active then by definition it is. Tollens (talk) 01:01, 30 November 2023 (UTC)