Template talk:WikiProject Politics

List-class articles
There is no automatic category for List-class politics articles, maybe this should be fixed... - Ilse@ 15:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Bug reports
There are a couple of bug reports in a template that transcludes this one, that look relevant. Template talk:WikiProject Political parties. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 18:43, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

No importance code for task force articles
moved from Template talk:WikiProject Political parties and followed up here

(The task force template) also fails for apparently correct. The categorization is correct, but the presentation omits the importance. See for example: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Something_New_(political_party)&oldid=654806914] --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 18:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * It was . You should ask, who made that edit, why they "don't care". -- Red rose64 (talk) 08:25, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Does the removal of this parameter affect Wikipedia 1.0 ? Please either restore the importance code to the template, or update the wikiproject and template documentation, and post a bulletin at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics. The relevant documentation pages I checked before I reported this as a bug are at: --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 15:40, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Template:WikiProject Politics/doc
 * WikiProject Politics/Assessment

Template-protected edit request on 11 April 2018
Add Gun politics task force. Proposed version can be seen at Template:WikiProject_Politics/sandbox. –dlthewave ☎ 14:47, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done for now: too much regression would result. Please base your changes on the current template, not one that is three years old. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 18:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I've updated the sandbox version with the current template, could you take a look at it again? This is my first template edit so any guidance would be appreciate. Thanks –dlthewave ☎ 01:30, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * OK, Yes check.svg Done -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 18:35, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Task force deprecation
According to by, four of the task forces are defunct, hence the associated parameters are deprecated. Is there a proposal anywhere to remove these parameters from the template proper? -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 07:22, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I just made some changes to the template sandbox on this matter. It would seek to put the defunct task forces into the note section instead of side-by-side with the active ones. Would there be any objection to this change? &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 21:07, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 4 July 2019
There has been no objection to this change, so I'm going to assume that it's fine. Please, Copy and Paste code found at WikiProject Politics/sandbox. Cheers, &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 02:53, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * nvm. Let me make some changes. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 03:03, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 11 March 2020
Please sync with Sandbox. I've re-ordered the task forces and added a new WikiProject which has merged with WP:POLITICS &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 15:06, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , is there any particular reason for the rearrange, or is it just a convenient side effect of adding the new task force? What is the new order, and how is it different from the old? Primefac (talk) 17:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I moved the inactive/defunct task forces to the bottom of the list (see above; this was easier than what I said I was going to do). &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 19:31, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Primefac (talk) 00:29, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 18 December 2020
Add alias for and  to support  and  &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 19:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅, and thank you very much!  P.I. Ellsworth   ed.  put'r there 16:42, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Revert
@WOSlinker: why did you undo your change to this template? &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:55, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @MSGJ: _PAGETYPE_ didn't work in the inactive taskforces section of the template. -- WOSlinker (talk) 19:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * That's true, it won't work with the hooks. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Why is this template in Category:Wikipedia substituted templates?
~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 21:20, 17 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The template transclusion chain goes WikiProject Politics -> WikiProject Politics/doc -> No subst -> Never substitute -> . Seems like the naming of Category:Wikipedia substituted templates is somewhat vague and inconsistent with how it is actually populated (templates where a decision on to substitute or not to substitute has been made). It is however distinct from Category:Wikipedia templates to be automatically substituted which is for templates that should be substituted and can be done so by a bot.  Harryboyles  23:32, 17 February 2024 (UTC)