Template talk:WikiProject Rock music

Merge
WPRock disco should be merged into this template. The functionality provided by it (a different category, etc.) should simply be done with a  or   or   parameter. See any project banner that makes use of task force parameters for code you can just copy-paste and modify, e.g. WPBiography. —  SMcCandlish  &#91;talk&#93; &#91;cont&#93; ‹(-¿-)› 20:58, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Template acting funky
The section of the template that states "The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article." is indented way to the right, making it come out very narrow and making the template itself go very long. I am not sure how to fix that formatting. Rlendog (talk) 05:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * If the word TEMPLATE is desired, instead of NA, may we have the code changed?
 * from
 * |FULL_QUALITY_SCALE =
 * to
 * |FULL_QUALITY_SCALE = yes
 * Then the word TEMPLATE would display whether |class=template or even just left blank |class=
 * Then the word TEMPLATE would display whether |class=template or even just left blank |class=


 * As it is now, even placing class=template in WikiProject Rock music still will not force the code to display the word TEMPLATE. Prapsnot (talk) 07:20, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

FIXING
Can somebody add this version, the other template is muddled up if you see Talk:Bryan Adams page, Talk:Linkin Park or many others, this problem can be fixed with this template. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 08:15, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done for now: What are the problems with the current template? I very much doubt they can't be fixed without reverting to a hardcoded version. Happy‑melon 07:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with not changing yet, until whatever issue there is can be pointed out and described. If it's anything, I think it could be that when it's transcluded there is the following line:"Comments: edit · history · watch · purge" Happy Melon, is that supposed to be there? Otherwise it looks like it's working correctly.Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 08:30, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * That's enabled by yes parameter, transcluding the /comments subpage where one exists. If that's not desirable, just remove that parameter to disable the functionality. Happy‑melon 12:17, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Small change
In the banner, can the two occurences of yes in the following section be removed.

Change: |ATTENTION_CAT       = yes |INFOBOX_CAT         = yes
 * infobox=

To: |ATTENTION_CAT       = |INFOBOX_CAT         =
 * infobox=

The reason is at those parameter should be Categories as you can see when you look at Category:Yes which is where the articles are currently being added to.

-- WOSlinker (talk) 19:27, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ Ruslik (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Edit Req
Could the sandbox version be copied over. It is just tidying up some of the banner options. Thanks. -- WOSlinker (talk) 22:06, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Done, please check --Stephen 00:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Book-class support
Several books have been tagged with the banner, but the subpage isn't enabled. Per documentation, simply set "|QUALITY_SCALE=subpage", and magic will happen. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 11:23, 17 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Done. Make sure everything works as intended as well. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 13:55, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * It does, thanks a bunch. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 21:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)