Template talk:WikiProject Somerset

Assessment issues
There is a problem with this template or it's operation & I can't work out what it is.... I originally created Somerset for WikiProject Somerset & had advice that is wasn't working properly & didn't "nest" on article talk pages. I also took ages to get it to handle importance ratings. Then this template was created & a redirect put on Somerset and I added a few importance ratings to several articles. The bot has now been round & is displaying the results in relation to class & importance at WikiProject Somerset. In the process we have now lost about 500 articles which had the original banner (including most of the FA, GA & B class) & I can't work out why. Some examples: So that gives the impression that anything with an importance ranking doesn't show up, however I can not understand why some do & some don't appear, and would appreciate any help or advice. I will put this request on other relevant pages but think the discussion should be here.&mdash; Rod talk 19:23, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Talk:List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Somerset includes the line and does show up in the current list
 * Talk:Chew Valley includes and does NOT show up in the listing
 * Talk:Chew Valley Lake includes & does NOT show.
 * Talk:Kennet and Avon Canal which includes does show up
 * Talk:Chew Magna which includes does NOT.


 * I see the issue; your template doesn't include any of the code to convert the ratings (FA, A, G etc) into the appropriate categories specific to your Project (Category:FA-Class Somerset articles, Category:A-Class Somerset articles, Category:GA-Class Somerset articles, Category:B-Class Somerset articles, Category:Start-Class Somerset articles, Category:Stub-Class Somerset articles). This categorization is what's used to generate the data for your WP statistics report. I believe the ones that show up do so because of other templates. If you're up to it, check out WikiProject Soap Operas and steal/adapt the appropriate coding. TAnthony 20:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for spotting the problem - but I think I'm well out of my league of technical competence here&mdash; Rod talk 20:30, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, I think I've done it; if you check the categories above, they are now populated. Do some more testing by rating some articles ... your examples above are a bit unique because I think some of the other templates on those pages are assigning or not assigning cats. I'll poke around a bit. TAnthony 20:40, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help (I'm watching your edits) but there should be 4 in FA & 8 in GA listed on WikiProject Somerset in Featured & Good content sections (which have all been rated) & about 60 in class=B catgories.&mdash; Rod talk 20:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, for some reason it seems to be fussy with the Somerset transclusion, which shouldn't be an issue. TAnthony 20:59, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * For example, Talk:Chew Valley Lake and Talk:Mendip Hills use Somerset and though the FA category appears, the articles were not listed there. I switched the template for Talk:Mendip Hills and it appeared in the cat. Something must be off somewhere in the upgraded template. TAnthony 21:04, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It seems to be working now for the transcluded template, perhaps it was a server backlog issue. TAnthony 22:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It was the job queue, most likely. Glad to see it's been sorted out.  &mdash; madman bum and angel 23:00, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Now lost importance
The bot has now run & updated the "Current Status" at WikiProject Somerset. We are back up to 1528 articles which includes all of those assessed as FA, GA, B etc class. However all of the importance ratings (which have been done for over 100 of the articles) have disappeared from the status report - anyone know why & can help us get this function working again?&mdash; Rod talk 08:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I've restored the importance parameter, but I don't see anywhere near the 100 items you mentioned on my talk page coming up in the categories. Looking at the last statistics run which included them, I only see like 29. Are you using non-standard terms instead of "mid" and "low" etc? The categories were already created in the past so I don't think that's the issue. TAnthony 16:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help I'm now seeing:

Maybe I exaggerated with over 100 done - but the total doesn't equal the 1528 identified for the class listing.&mdash; Rod talk 16:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 4 in Category:Top-importance Somerset articles
 * 11 in Category:High-importance Somerset articles
 * 21 in Category:Mid-importance Somerset articles
 * 24 in Category:Low-importance Somerset articles
 * 996 in Category:Unknown-importance Somerset articles
 * Yeah, it seems like it's the same job queue delay as before; the numbers have actually updated themselves from your post above, I now count 1532 among the categories (4 top, 12 high, 28 mid, 37 low and 1451 unknown) TAnthony 17:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Brilliant - thanks for all your help & I'll now wait another 3 days before the bot runs again to be absolutely sure everything is working properly.&mdash; Rod talk 18:18, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Somerset-coa.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Somerset-coa.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:39, 1 March 2011 (UTC)