User:!777francis777!/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Bubble sort

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to evaluate this article because it covers a very fundamental topic in computer science, so I would assume that the wiki page for it would be well made. After glancing through it, I would say that the wiki page was well made.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section:

The lead section has an introductory sentence that concisely an clearly describes the article's topic. It includes a brief description of the article's major sections, and it is concise without including any information not present in the article.

Content:

The article's content is relevant to the topic as it covers the fundamentals of explaining how the algorithm works as well as the runtime complexity. Both of which are critical as the main reason most people would read this article for would be to prepare for coding interviews where this knowledge is critical, or they are studying algorithms to understand which ones are more optimal in certain situations. This article does not necessarily do anything to try to address Wikipedia's equity gaps because it is just an informational article about an algorithm.

Tone and Balance:

The tone is neutral, and there aren't any viewpoints with any particular hidden agenda. It was just an informational article that discussed the algorithm itself.

Sources and References:

All sources in the article are backed up with a reliable secondary source of information. The sources are current and written by a diverse spectrum of authors. I checked a few of the sources, and the links work.

Organization and Writing Quality:

The article is concise, clear and easy to read. There aren't any grammatical or spelling errors.

Images and Media:

The article has images that help explain the algorithm along with visuals that demonstrate how the algorithm works.

Talk Page Discussion:

The discussions in the talk page mainly talk about the accuracy of the information presented in terms of the algorithm as well as the diagrams presented. The article has a B rating and is a part of the following WikiProjects: Mathematics, Computing, and Computer Science.

Overall Impressions:

I thought the article was fairly well-written. If I wanted to learn about bubble sort, and this was the resource that was given to me, I would be fairly confident in my understanding of the algorithm as there is a good explanation of how it works as well as several examples through pseudocode as well as animations.