User:*Byaa42/Northern Rocky Mountains Provincial Park/RibsWiki18 Peer Review

General info
RibsWiki18
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:*Byaa42/Northern Rocky Mountains Provincial Park
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

I like how the lead gives me the exact location of the topic. The given surroundings set the stage perfectly for the article. Interesting factoids included as well, already learning something right away. My only suggestion would be to cite some of the numbers.

Article Body: Its nice to have every section broken up well. If I was only interested in one of the sub topics of this article it would be simple to navigate to the information I needed. Is there more information about the stop in work for the advisory group appointed in 2000? I'd love to hear more about how the increase in participation specifically by the Indigenous community has lead to the resumption of work on the park. I'd like to hear more about the specific types of animals that are found in the park, to show what makes the park unique. The addition of a climate change section is something I will be using for my own article, a great idea.

Overall thoughts (tone, suggestions, references)

Some more references would help support the facts and information about the park. Great neutral voice, doesn't make the reader feel like there is any bias here. Really good choices of what to include, I felt like I learned a lot of very interesting information.