User:;~enwiki/tfd sandbox

Section 1
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Section 2
 Closed 
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.  

The result of the debate was

Template:O RLY?
Unencyclopeic redirect to fact, not in use anymore. --KJ 05:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, bad-faith nomination. Analysis of your contributions reveals that you've orphaned it merely for the sake of deleting it, and that people (besides myself even) actually do use this. — Jun. 7, '06  [05:19] < [ freak]|[ talk] >
 * It's true I've orphaned it on purpose, but I don't see how that amounts to bad faith. It's not in widespread use (compared to "fact" or "citation needed") and I dare say its use should be discouraged. --KJ 05:27, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Anyway, my point was that we don't need O RLY? in an encyclopedia; it's amateurish, and we don't need a redirect to an existing template just for a bad joke. What's more, you've gone and reverted my edits, and now all pages that include the O RLY? template are now botched. --KJ 05:38, 7 June 2006 (UTC) Thanks for fixing. --KJ 07:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, redundant. --Coredesat 09:10, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * It's not redundant to anything, it's a redirect. --Rory096 16:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't understand the purpose of this template, this is totally unencyclopedic and useless. Afonso Silva 12:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - redundant. 13:24, 7 June 2006 (UTC) — [ Unsigned .]
 * Delete - redundant and unencyclopedic. Slowmover 15:29, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, this isn't RfD. --Rory096 16:37, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, RfDed. --KJ 17:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.