User:Τασουλα/Archive 1

Reply
The user's behaviors have been reported to Wikimedia Foundation. Hope they can take action to the user. Thanks for your message first. SoHome Jacaranda Lilau (talk) 16:50, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. Edit: You play wikipedias Mascot? Was looking at all that stuff when I found out the guy who draws her also draws...slightly less nice images. Not that that's any fault on you. --Τασουλα (Shalom!) (talk) 18:10, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit summaries
"Per WP:Cornwall guideline" would suffice - there are some who will argue that the insistence on including England is a nationalist POV (and certainly, some of those who in the past have kicked up a fuss when it was not included were themselves English nationalists). DuncanHill (talk) 21:39, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Why can't I put the correct information that Christian Bale is a Welsh person? As he is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.13.10.12 (talk) 18:39, 17 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Fair enough! Happens to all of us, :) DuncanHill (talk) 21:52, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Revert?
I'm gonna scare you out of bed at night! --Vampire Snuffleupagus (talk) 15:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Roald Dahl
Nothing of the sort. I was spending time looking for evidence before I replied. I was unaware you saw yourself bordering on being a nationalist, (and I'm not even sure what nation that is) but Wikipidia can be a very slow beast... I waited over two years before somone posted a reply to my question on pufflings. You're argument is a good one, but the Christian Bale issue is a non-goer as he is not Welsh, he was born in the country but left for England in his early days and does not see himslef as Welsh. Language is a red herring, Kate Bosse-Griffiths wrote in Welsh but was German. Dylan Thomas wrote in English but is Welsh. 80% of Wales use the English language and most are only English language speakers. But what gives you your nationality? Wales see Dahl as Welsh, he was voted in the top 100 greatest Welsh people, he is included in the Encyclopedia of Wales. But how did he view himself. It may need this argument brought up on his talk page to find a resolution. FruitMonkey (talk) 23:24, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar!

 * Return is not an obligation. And yes, I do :) Bped1985 (talk) 18:41, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, but
I just can't stand the bloody idiots on that page (even if it means taking down the real contributors), not to mention the vodka. Plus, I enjoyed edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Catherine,_Duchess_of_Cambridge&oldid=426555271. Enjoy the evening and the mornings to come, God save the Duke and Duchess! --120.154.177.255 (talk) 14:01, 29 April 2011 (UTC) No worries, I won't edit again tonight
 * Mmmmm. OK. Na, I think you can archive and close non-constructive discussions on the page while keeping many of the good ones active. It's something called "Hat" and "Hab" I think. --Τασουλα (Shalom!) (talk) 14:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Going to ask nicely
I think you fill find that 'fixing errors or violations of Wikipedia policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles' is not considered harassment but I am sorry that you felt it as such and I shall refrain from editing any pages which you have unless serious wikipedia policy violation is brought to my notice. Bobadillaman (talk) 09:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Cornwall
I noticed you reverted the IP edits individually. Don't know if you know, but an alternative would have been to simply go back through the history and save the last good version - or alternatively to apply for WP:rollback (here) - very little experience necessary! - which gives you the ability to revert several edits with one single click. Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:45, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Civility
Hi. Your edit summary here and this message crossed the line of WP:CIVIL. I know that some people's continual pushing of a point of view can be most irritating, but that's what they're doing it for. Probably the best way of dealing with such edits is simply to revert and ignore, as discussed in WP:RBI. I'm sure you're aware of our civility policy and just temporarily lost your calm in this instance. —S MALL JIM   10:38, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Arbcom
Believe it or not, I'm being accused of a "Pro-British" bias again. See Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case, perhaps you'd care to comment on my alleged "Pro-Argentine" bias. Ciao. Wee Curry Monster talk 10:21, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * (Yet another bunch of Argentine nationalists who don't realise the Argentine government is trying to use a very minor issue to distract them from the reality of there failing economical and huge social problems). No wait, that's POV. I've taken a look at the ArbCom page on this and see two declines listed so it looks to be resolved soon. (I'm not familiar with Arbcom, I don't even know if I can post comments) but his evidence and his alone in regards to games and Bias was incredibly weak in the fact he names several dubious editors - Fsmallmann (No longer active but his only contributions sounded like fringe theories - "Claimed?" they are not claimed, they just are ect) "Vintagekits" (Blocked) "MFIreland" (Blocked) - I can see no issue of Bias or games on this article at all, perhaps imbalance. I can't comment directly. --Τασουλα (Shalom!) (talk) 11:15, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:29, 18 June 2011 (UTC)