User:اربابی دوم/archive

archive
Village pump/Copyright

archive
It was an interesting explanation. But my question is this: "Does science mean human science or is science an abstract concept that can be defined independently of man (the owner of science)?" Dialectical discussions have many strengths, but the weakness of these discussions is sometimes ignoring wide diversity. In the discussion of belief in God or disbelief, focusing on this main pole leads to ignoring the diversity of the intervening. The logical result of denying God is not that mankind is on top of the world. Perhaps there are many types of superhumans. Causality is not necessarily tangible. In other words, what is arbitrary from one person's point of view can be rational from another's point of view and vice versa.

archive 2




ARCV


archive 3
