User:دکترحسین شهبازی/sandbox

Born: Tabriz

Education: PhD in Persian language and literature from Tabriz University Hossein Shahbazi (born July 1, 1985 in Tabriz) is an Iranian writer, poet and researcher in Persian language and literature and in the field of comparative mysticism. He received his Doctor of Philosophy in the field of Persian literature in 2018 from University of Tabriz.

The topic of his thesis was a Comparative research of Sufism with Kabbalah and Gnosticism, which was published in 2018 under the title of Sufism, Kabbalah and Gnosticism in a comparative perspective by Zovar Publishing House in Tehran. In addition to researching and teaching mysticism and Persian language, he has been working in Tabriz Metro as the director of public relations and international affairs since 2010.

books
a Comparative research of Sufism with Kabbalah and Gnosticism (=persian: Taṣavvuf, Qabālā va Ginūsī dar nigāh-i taṭbīqī, تصوف، قبالا و گنوسی در نگاه تطبیقی') 2019: t.p. (Duktur Ḥusayn Shahbāzī) p. 4 of cover (Dr. Hossein Shahbazi [in rom.])

Minhāj al-ʻArabīyah, 2015 (Arabic title: منهاج العربیة)

Papers
1- Gnosticism from Thought to Religion this article will answer the following questions: What are the components of Gnostic thought? What are the sources of Gnostic thought? Were there any sects known as Gnostics before Christ? This research shows that most of our knowledge of Gnosticism is based on controversial Christian works and the Qumran manuscripts.

2- A Comparative Study of "Exile of the soul" in the Tradition of Islamic Sufism and Gnosticism The belief in the Exile of the soul from the spiritual origin to the lower world, and the belief in the need for the soul to return to its original homeland, is a common theme in the Gnostic and Sufism teachings. In this paper, the authors have adapted the various aspects of the issue of the Exile of the soul to the esoteric thought of these two schools. In order to achieve this, explained the general framework of the Sufism and Gnostic views on Exile of the soul firstly. Then, by analyzing the structure and theme of the two allegorical tales of" Hymn of the Pearl" and" the tale of the Western Exile" from the esoteric stories of the Gnostic and Islamic Sufism were identified the similarities and their differences.

3- A Comparative Study of “Good and Evil” in Sufism and Kabbalah “Good and Evil”, and their relation to the origin of being, as well as their being issued from the single principle, or dual and multiple principles, are the most critical topics in the teachings of mystical schools. Sufism and Kabbalah also have particular views about Good and Evil, their relationship with each other, the source of their authenticity, or their relativity in the world. This paper attempts to explain these views using a comparative study. Sufism and Kabbalah consider God as an absolute Good, but at the same time, they can not deny the existence of evil in this world. Meanwhile, Sufism has solved the paradox of attributing evil to absolute Goodness by grabbing the concept of relativity. But most of the Kabbalists ignored this contradiction and attributed the evil directly to God. The great figures in Sufism consider the good as innate and the evil as accidental. But some Kabbalists regard certain evil as intrinsic, and others, like Sufis, regard evil as accidental.

4- A Comparative Study of mystical conduct dwellings in Islamic Sufism and Jewish mysticism (Merkava and Kabbalah) In Comparative Study of mystical conduct dwellings in Islamic Sufism and Jewish mysticism following conclusions can be reached: 1) the similarity of the number of conduct dwellings; seven Valleys, Seven Hekhalots. 2) The need for acquaintance of the mystic with the main name code as the keyword of the garlic in the realm conduct. 3) The description of spiritual dwellings in the form of allegory and in the form of material traits. 4) The symbol of the "Palace of empyrean" is the last dwelling of conduct in Kabbalah and Sufism. 5) The ultimate goal of the conduct achieving the status of Mortal's Sufism and Araboth - Devekoth Kabbalah. 6) Emphasis on the love nature of conduct. 7) the most significant difference is the embodiment of God at the last stage journey of Jews mysticism, in the form of humanity and the non-embodiment of the nature of God in Sufism. 8) Differences in the way of expressing mystical experiences and interpretations, symbols and expressions related to religion, culture and social requirements.

5- A Comparative Study of "God-like Man" Based on Sufism, Kabbalah and Gnosticism Regardless of the method of explanation, god-like man is one of the teachings common among Sufism, Merkabah, Kabbalah and Gnosticism. The commonalities and differences of this idea in the form of proposing a holy example of man can be seen under such interpretations as Adam Kadmon, Anthropos and the first man in Jewish mysticism, Gnosticism and Sufism. The present paper contains a comparative study of this idea. The results show that despite the common points, a fundamental difference can be found among these ideas. The inability of the Gnostics to separate the Almighty God from his first creation (Anthropos) has led them to dualism. The Merkabah have tried to make distinctions between the one God and Adam Kadmon, but in practice they have not been able to separate the two. While believing in monotheism, The Kabbalah have proposed the "An-Suf" and failed to state its relation to Jehovah, and therefore have made themselves liable to accusations of getting away from the monotheism, but have tried to remove this accusation. In Sufism, the resemblance of the first intellect to God has caused some sheikhs to assume that the first intellect is God, but resorting to monotheism has ultimately led them to God Almighty.