User:とある白い猫/RfC April 2006

In order to remain listed at Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 14:20, 22 April 2006 (UTC)}), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is:, 29 July 2024 (UTC).



Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute
''This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.''
 * User has had an overal incivil and offensive tone. User prefers to 'discuss' contributors rather than contribution or topic. user has been repetively warned and given more than enough slack. Cat chi? 14:26, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Description
''{Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries, other than to endorse them.}''

Evidence of disputed behavior
(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)
 * WP Talk:RfAr/Coolcat Davenbelle Stereotek/Proposed decision: 14:50, 4 September 2005 - User:Fadix - Coolcats disruption of the Armenian Genocide entry)
 * Threatens Arbcom: Either something is done about this, or I’ll kick Coolcat out of the Armenian Genocide entry myself and will assume the consequences.
 * Rest of the page is full of other personal attacks. I do not believe however anyone will read over a meg of text.
 * Reverts w/o looking... The actual change is merely spelling and smimilar corrections.
 * Quit it Thoth, I have enought of it, your undertanding of NPOV policy is as weak as Coolcats
 * User talk:Cool Cat: 17:10, 8 March 2006
 * Acusses me of sockpuppetary while threatening to arbcom me to achieve 'harder sanctions'.
 * User:Fadix: 13:25, 20 March 2006 - User:Fadix
 * I PLACED THE REST OF MY TEXT ON THE RIGHT SIDE LEAVING THE REST BLANK AS A PROTEST TO USERPAGES IDIOTIC AND NATIONALISTIC TEMPLATES THAT HAVE NO PLACE IN WIKIPEDIA. etc.
 * Naming dispute. Fadix suggests Azeri or Turkish names of places are not to be even mentioned on an article explaining an Azeri territory.
 * If you want to be respected respect others and stop lying about them.
 * Naming dispute. Fadix suggests Azeri or Turkish names of places are not to be even mentioned on an article explaining an Azeri territory.
 * If you want to be respected respect others and stop lying about them.
 * If you want to be respected respect others and stop lying about them.
 * If you want to be respected respect others and stop lying about them.

Applicable policies and guidelines
{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}
 * No Personal Attacks
 * Civility

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute
(provide diffs and links)

Users certifying the basis for this dispute
{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}


 * Cat chi? 14:31, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Response
''This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.'' ''

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view
''This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.''

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Discussion
All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.