User:とある白い猫/RfC March 2006

This RfC is a systematic bias complaint on a range of articles by a number of people.

Civility

 * 1) *Declares some wikipedians (or their actions) Anti-Semitic and cites them as examples of Anti-Semitism.
 * 2) *An exchange of continuing incivil comments.
 * 3) *Indirectly accuses "a lot of users" adding "racist, sometimes anti-Semitic propaganda". Which may be true, but his tone is still incivil.
 * 4) *A variety of comments that can be easily interpreted as personal attacks.
 * 1) *Indirectly accuses "a lot of users" adding "racist, sometimes anti-Semitic propaganda". Which may be true, but his tone is still incivil.
 * 2) *A variety of comments that can be easily interpreted as personal attacks.
 * 1) *A variety of comments that can be easily interpreted as personal attacks.
 * 1) *A variety of comments that can be easily interpreted as personal attacks.

Policy enforcement

 * 1) *Complains about published material violating WP:NOR which is self conflicting.
 * 2) *Is fast to remove/replace anything disputing factual acuracy with in the middle of an ongoing discussion.
 * 3) *Aucaman started this article with a pov title (Turkish Kurdistan = Turkish lands owned by kurds). Many other editors, one being Gruntness, agree with me on this.
 * 1) *Is fast to remove/replace anything disputing factual acuracy with in the middle of an ongoing discussion.
 * 2) *Aucaman started this article with a pov title (Turkish Kurdistan = Turkish lands owned by kurds). Many other editors, one being Gruntness, agree with me on this.

Other potentialy problematic behaviour

 * 1) *Suggests several cited and published material "outdated and insignificant".
 * 2) *Generalises and talks behalf of Iranians and dismisses theories "brought by outsiders to iranian scholars". So iranian and outsider pov is false which basicaly is everyone.
 * 3) *Dismisses "Iranian books" and declares them unusable in an article talking about Persians.
 * I am not fascinated with the politics behind Persian people, but from what I recall from history persians lived in the same area occupied by modern Iran. I personaly believe the best source of information about any culture, ethnic group, etc. is from the culture, ethnic group, etc. I do not believe Iranian books are to be ignored especialy when Iran is being discussed.
 * 1) *Dismisses "Iranian books" and declares them unusable in an article talking about Persians.
 * I am not fascinated with the politics behind Persian people, but from what I recall from history persians lived in the same area occupied by modern Iran. I personaly believe the best source of information about any culture, ethnic group, etc. is from the culture, ethnic group, etc. I do not believe Iranian books are to be ignored especialy when Iran is being discussed.
 * I am not fascinated with the politics behind Persian people, but from what I recall from history persians lived in the same area occupied by modern Iran. I personaly believe the best source of information about any culture, ethnic group, etc. is from the culture, ethnic group, etc. I do not believe Iranian books are to be ignored especialy when Iran is being discussed.

Good contributions

 * RC patroling here, which is a good thing. Although test2 before test1 is bad, but he fixed that problem himself
 * RC patroling here, which is a good thing. Although test2 before test1 is bad, but he fixed that problem himself

Civility

 * 1) Talk:West Azarbaijan/Archive3 is full of examples of personal attacks and threats. See this diff.
 * 2) *Few examples from the diff:
 * 3) *#In fact I am discussing with a racist Qashqai turk pasdar terrorist pro ahmadinejad who even do not recognize UN emblem and think it is PDK's
 * 4) *#Ignore us ignore us.. but after saddam it is your turn.
 * 5) *User also discusses the topic in foreign language(s). This is english wikipedia and talk should commence in english so we all understand what the heck they are talking about. Especialy if the topic is contraversial and it appears to be.

Neutrality

 * 1) *Source suggests:
 * 2) **By 1999, Turkey had largely suppressed Kurdish resistance by extreme terror and ethnic cleansing, leaving some 2 to 3 million refugees, 3,500 villages destroyed (seven times as high as in Kosovo under NATO bombs), and tens of thousands killed, primarily during the Clinton years...
 * 3) *Oh by the way this page does not discuss the holiday at all. And only one referance of the word 'Newroz' is made at the notes section.
 * 4) *Cannot tolerate alternative spellings
 * 5) *User considers article merging to be slavery.
 * 1) *Cannot tolerate alternative spellings
 * 2) *User considers article merging to be slavery.
 * 1) *User considers article merging to be slavery.

Neutrality

 * 1) Kingdom_of_Kurdistan: 00:55, 3 March 2006 - User:Heja helweda - Northern Kurdistan (Southeastern Turkey)
 * 2) **The Kingdom of Kurdistan did not last long, thanks to the British Royal Air Force acting on behalf of a puppet government in Baghdad. The British were not much kinder to the Kurds. It is wrongly preserved that the first regime that used poison gases against Kurds was Saddam Hussein’s government. This is wrong. British were the first regime to gas Kurds in Iraqi Kurdistan.
 * 3) *Hardly neutral. Especialy the 'gas attack' section summerised above.

bad faith

 * 1) User is responsible for a number of articles that violate copyrights. I noticed some and marked them as copy vios due to a request by User:FrancisTyers #*In retaliation he 'found' copy vios on a number of articles related to turkey . On one case mislabeled  as a copy vio as the page contained information from the cia world factbook, a pd source.


 * All contribs

Civility

 * 1) *The only "real" response I got to my inqueries regarding the mass taging of articles was "Bozmongols do not have in Wikipedi to searches!!!! I mean you". I am not sure what that supposed to mean, I do not think it was intended to enligten me.
 * 2) *My attempts to comunicate with him ultimately resulted with: "ach siktir Lan". As my language skills in Turkish are less than perfect, I asked the meaning of "ach siktir Lan". I am told "siktir Lan" translates to "Fuck off" in Turkish although people are puzzled on the meaning of "ach".
 * 1) *My attempts to comunicate with him ultimately resulted with: "ach siktir Lan". As my language skills in Turkish are less than perfect, I asked the meaning of "ach siktir Lan". I am told "siktir Lan" translates to "Fuck off" in Turkish although people are puzzled on the meaning of "ach".
 * 1) *My attempts to comunicate with him ultimately resulted with: "ach siktir Lan". As my language skills in Turkish are less than perfect, I asked the meaning of "ach siktir Lan". I am told "siktir Lan" translates to "Fuck off" in Turkish although people are puzzled on the meaning of "ach".

Categories

 * Kurdistan is a contraversial definition of a region of which the boundries are determined by whoever is drawing them.
 * 1) *Just one example of mass tagging of random provinces in Turkey, Syria, Iraq, and Iran
 * 2) *Mykonos is a restouran in Berlin, Germany.
 * My attempts to comunicate with him falied as he does not know english.
 * 1) *Mykonos is a restouran in Berlin, Germany.
 * My attempts to comunicate with him falied as he does not know english.

Involvement with my Rfa

 * 1) Voted oppose (which alone is fine as everyone entitled to their opinion) with "I please you Pleas, Cool Cat is an Turkish Nationalis is not got Administrator"
 * 2) Posted a simmilar "comment" on following pages:
 * 3) *English post: Wikipedia talk:Esperanza, User talk:Aranda56 , User talk:Dynamo ace
 * 4) *German post: User talk:Banes, User talk:Dmn
 * In my view this kind of behavior on RfAs is trolling. Again in my view such behaviour should not be tollerated.