User:とある白い猫/deletion

This proposal is obsolated by the joint effort: Votes for Deletion, the next generation

User:White Cat's proposal
Ok I am going to create a list of things from above as well as from my mind. Cat chi? 01:22, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Article vote should be on article's talk page rather than a redundant template.
 * Author(s) should be asked to defend their article since they are supposed to know most. They should explain why the article is notable, etc.
 * All deletions will apear in a category anyways so there will still be a centralised list automaticaly generated. Which means I don't have to click here type this copy that to there etc.
 * Establish firm and solid rules for criteria.
 * VfD has no future and usage. Trash it.
 * If something is deletable a quickie delete should do the trick. Which means we have less bureaucracy.
 * How do you define what's "deletable", so to speak? Rob Church 02:47, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Primary problem we have are "fanatics" of any given topic. It only takes 2-8 "fanatics" *cough* GNAA *cough* to cause havoc.
 * Voting should be done in binary logic, Yes/No. For gods sake NO MORE of these: maybe, perhaps, merge, redirect, semi delete, defragment, etc.
 * (Optional) A community (like arbitration) specialised in this (deletion) process

Users endorsing this proposal (sign with ~ ):


 * 1) Uncle Ed 01:56, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) I certainly agree with an arbitration group, however, you'd end up with a group of users clearing up a load of deletion stuff, and not contributing to the project overall, which isn't fair to my mind. Perhaps users could opt into a month's "deletion duty" or somesuch? Rob Church 02:48, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

Users not endorsing this proposal (sign with ~ ):
 * 1) AlbertR 02:13, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Problem with the category is that it's not sorted chronologically, making it hard to follow deletions. --SPUI (talk) 02:26, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Given the volume of vfds, we could use dated subcategories such as Category:VfD/August 2nd. NoSeptember  02:55, 2 August 2005 (UTC)